Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21086118›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2011

Automatic recording of mediating behavior in delayed matching- and nonmatching-to-position procedures in rats.

Leigh V Panlilio, Sevil Yasar, Eric B Thorndike, Steven R Goldberg, Charles W Schindler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leigh V PanlilioPreclinical Pharmacology Section, Behavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. lpanlili@intra.nida.nih.gov
Sevil Yasar
Eric B Thorndike
Steven R Goldberg
Charles W Schindler
National Institutes of Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Drugs On Learned & Spontaneous Behavior Of Experimental AnimalsZIADA000003 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SHAHAM, YAVIN · 2009 to 2017
$6.8M
EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON SCHEDULE-CONTROLLED BEHAVIOR OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALSZ01DA000003 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI GOLDBERG, STEVEN R · 1991 to 2008
$2.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDelayed matching-to-position and nonmatching-to-position procedures are widely used to model working memory in rodents. Mediating behavior-which enhances performance but is not explicitly required by the task-is generally considered an obstacle to the measurement of memory, but often occurs despite attempts to prevent it. The ubiquitous nature of mediating behavior suggests it might be analogous to rehearsal, an important component of learning and memory in humans.

objectivesThe aim was to study an easily recordable, rehearsal-like mediating response in rats under baseline conditions and after treatment with amnestic drugs [scopolamine (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 1-5.6 mg/kg)].

methodsLighted nosepoke holes were used to present position cues and record delayed matching or nonmatching responses. Performance of a distractor task was required to prevent simply waiting at the correct choice, but the nosepoke holes were left accessible during the delay.

resultsEach rat trained with the nonmatching task exhibited one of two mediating "strategies" that increased the odds of a correct choice: responding in the to-be-correct hole during the delay or responding in the opposite hole during the delay. Rats trained with the matching task all showed the former strategy. Treatment with scopolamine disrupted performance of the mediating response. Scopolamine and THC both decreased the effectiveness of the mediating response, increasing errors even on trials when the "appropriate" mediating behavior did occur.

conclusionsThe procedures and data analysis approach used here provide an objective, automated means of measuring mediating behavior, which might be useful as an animal model of memory rehearsal.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCuesMemoryAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDronabinolMaleOdds RatioPsychotropic DrugsRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeScopolamineTime FactorsDronabinolPsychotropic DrugsScopolamine

Identifiers

PMID21086118
PMCPMC3050121
OpenAlexW2023328503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.