Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21085957›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2011

Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Surendra Senthi, Jacob T Munro, Rocco P Pitto

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. ImagingmBio · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Comparison ofHip & pelvis · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Emergency Department Visits Following Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Surendra SenthiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, South Auckland Clinical School, University of Auckland, Private Bag, 93311, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jacob T Munro
Rocco P Pitto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While total hip arthroplasty has progressed to become one of the most successful surgical procedures ever developed, infection remains a serious complication. We have conducted a review of the literature pertaining to management of deep infection in total hip arthroplasty, specifically focusing on clinically relevant articles published in the last five years. A search was conducted using MEDLINE and PubMed, as well as a review of the Cochrane database, using the terms "total hip arthroplasty", "total hip replacement" and "infection". References for all selected articles were cross-checked. While the so-called two-stage revision is generally considered to be the gold standard for management, numerous studies now report outcomes for implant retention and reassessing one-stage revision strategies. There are encouraging reports for complex reconstruction options in patients with associated severe bone stock loss. The duration of antibiotic therapy remains controversial. There is concern about increasing bacterial resistance especially with the widespread use of vancomycin and ertapenem (carbapenem).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBacterial InfectionsDatabases, BibliographicDebridementHip JointHip ProsthesisHumansProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID21085957
PMCPMC3032119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.