ArticlePloS one2010
Environmental barcoding reveals massive dinoflagellate diversity in marine environments.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress, challenges and future directions in marine organic-walled dinoflagellate cyst research: New insights from an international workshop.Marine micropaleontology · 2025Article
- Genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of common house crows (Corvus splendens).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- New plastids, old proteins: repeated endosymbiotic acquisitions in kareniacean dinoflagellates.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Beyond the limits of the unassigned protist microbiome: inferring large-scale spatio-temporal patterns of Syndiniales marine parasites.ISME communications · 2023Article
- Valorisation of algal biomass to value-added metabolites: emerging trends and opportunities.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2022Review
- Pragmatic Applications and Universality of DNA Barcoding for Substantial Organisms at Species Level: A Review to Explore a Way Forward.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Assessing the Use of Molecular Barcoding and qPCR for Investigating the Ecology ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Diversity of dinoflagellate assemblages in coastal temperate and offshore tropical waters of Australia.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Identification of Eukaryotic Microalgal Strains.Journal of applied phycology · 2020Article
- Environmental DNA from plastic and textile marine litter detects exotic and nuisance species nearby ports.PloS one · 2020Article
- Microalgae metabolites: A rich source for food and medicine.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2019Review
- Article
- Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene as a DNA barcode for discriminating Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and closely related species.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
- Conserved Transcriptional Responses to Nutrient Stress in Bloom-Forming Algae.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Pay Attention to the Overlooked Cryptic Diversity in Existing Barcoding Data: the Case of Mollusca with Character-Based DNA Barcoding.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2016Article
- Role of DNA barcoding in marine biodiversity assessment and conservation: An update.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2016Review
- The past, present and future of mitochondrial genomics: have we sequenced enough mtDNAs?Briefings in functional genomics · 2016Review
- Exploring the environmental diversity of kinetoplastid flagellates in the high-throughput DNA sequencing era.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2015Review
- Transcriptomic characterization of the enzymatic antioxidants FeSOD, MnSOD, APX and KatG in the dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium.BMC evolutionary biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDinoflagellates are an ecologically important group of protists with important functions as primary producers, coral symbionts and in toxic red tides. Although widely studied, the natural diversity of dinoflagellates is not well known. DNA barcoding has been utilized successfully for many protist groups. We used this approach to systematically sample known "species", as a reference to measure the natural diversity in three marine environments. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsIn this study, we assembled a large cytochrome c oxidase 1 (COI) barcode database from 8 public algal culture collections plus 3 private collections worldwide resulting in 336 individual barcodes linked to specific cultures. We demonstrate that COI can identify to the species level in 15 dinoflagellate genera, generally in agreement with existing species names. Exceptions were found in species belonging to genera that were generally already known to be taxonomically challenging, such as Alexandrium or Symbiodinium. Using this barcode database as a baseline for cultured dinoflagellate diversity, we investigated the natural diversity in three diverse marine environments (Northeast Pacific, Northwest Atlantic, and Caribbean), including an evaluation of single-cell barcoding to identify uncultivated groups. From all three environments, the great majority of barcodes were not represented by any known cultured dinoflagellate, and we also observed an explosion in the diversity of genera that previously contained a modest number of known species, belonging to Kareniaceae. In total, 91.5% of non-identical environmental barcodes represent distinct species, but only 51 out of 603 unique environmental barcodes could be linked to cultured species using a conservative cut-off based on distances between cultured species. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: COI barcoding was successful in identifying species from 70% of cultured genera. When applied to environmental samples, it revealed a massive amount of natural diversity in dinoflagellates. This highlights the extent to which we underestimate microbial diversity in the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.