Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21084784›Full record

ReviewPostgraduate medicine2010

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: relevant but underused.

Daniel E Forman, Jonathan Myers, Carl J Lavie, Marco Guazzi, Bartolome Celli, Ross Arena

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postgraduate medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06614634 (Comparison of Center-Based and Tele Cardiac Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity, Quality of Life, and Fear of Activity in Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06614634 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Center-Based and Tele Cardiac Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity, Quality of Life, and Fear of Activity in Coronary Artery Disease: A Patient-Preferred, Controlled, Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Cardiac Rehabilitation, Telecardiac Rehabilitation, Aerobic ExerciseArmsRemotely supervised exercise at home or outdoors, Hospital-based exercise program, Cardiovascular risk modification, Phone calls with reinforcement feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comprehensive cardiopulmonary profile of individuals with Down syndrome.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Obesity Blunts the Ventilatory Response to Exercise in Men and Women.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel E FormanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. deforman@partners.org
Jonathan Myers
Carl J Lavie
Marco Guazzi
Bartolome Celli
Ross Arena

Funding

Senior Research Career ScientistIK6RX002477 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI MYERS, JONATHAN N. · 2017 to 2025
–
RRD VA IK6 RX002477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a relatively old technology, but has sustained relevance for many primary care clinical scenarios in which it is, ironically, rarely considered. Advancing computer technology has made CPX easier to administer and interpret at a time when our aging population is more prone to comorbidities and higher prevalence of nonspecific symptoms of exercise intolerance and dyspnea, for which CPX is particularly useful diagnostically and prognostically. These discrepancies in application are compounded by patterns in which CPX is often administered and interpreted by cardiology, pulmonary, or exercise specialists who limit their assessments to the priorities of their own discipline, thereby missing opportunities to distinguish symptom origins. When used properly, CPX enables the physician to assess fitness and uncover cardiopulmonary issues at earlier phases of work-up, which would therefore be especially useful for primary care physicians. In this article, we provide an overview of CPX principles and testing logistics, as well as some of the clinical contexts in which it can enhance patient care.

Indexed as

Exercise ToleranceAnaerobic ThresholdCardiovascular DiseasesExercise TestFemaleHeart Function TestsHumansLung DiseasesMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical FitnessPrognosisRespiratory Function TestsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID21084784
PMCPMC9445315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.