ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011
Common synaptic input to the human hypoglossal motor nucleus.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-task motor performance with a tongue-operated assistive technology compared with hand operations.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2012Trial
- Measurement and State-Dependent Modulation of Hypoglossal Motor Excitability and Responsivity In-Vivo.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Influence of respiratory mechanics and drive on genioglossus movement under ultrasound imaging.PloS one · 2018Article
- Synchronization of motor unit firings: an epiphenomenon of firing rate characteristics not common inputs.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Common drive to the upper airway muscle genioglossus during inspiratory loading.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- A comprehensive assessment of genioglossus electromyographic activity in healthy adults.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Human hypoglossal motor unit activities in exercise.The Journal of physiology · 2013Article
- Factors influencing the estimates of correlation between motor unit activities in humans.PloS one · 2012Article
- Cortical entrainment of human hypoglossal motor unit activities.Journal of neurophysiology · 2012Article
- Respiratory related control of hypoglossal motoneurons--knowing what we do not know.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2011Review
- Activities of human genioglossus motor units.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2011Review
- Synchronization of presynaptic input to motor units of tongue, inspiratory intercostal, and diaphragm muscles.Journal of neurophysiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The tongue plays a key role in various volitional and automatic functions such as swallowing, maintenance of airway patency, and speech. Precisely how hypoglossal motor neurons, which control the tongue, receive and process their often concurrent input drives is a subject of ongoing research. We investigated common synaptic input to the hypoglossal motor nucleus by measuring the coordination of spike timing, firing rate, and oscillatory activity across motor units recorded from unilateral (i.e., within a belly) or bilateral (i.e., across both bellies) locations within the genioglossus (GG), the primary protruder muscle of the tongue. Simultaneously recorded pairs of motor units were obtained from 14 healthy adult volunteers using tungsten microelectrodes inserted percutaneously into the GG while the subjects were engaged in volitional tongue protrusion or rest breathing. Bilateral motor unit pairs showed concurrent low frequency alterations in firing rate (common drive) with no significant difference between tasks. Unilateral motor unit pairs showed significantly stronger common drive in the protrusion task compared with rest breathing, as well as higher indices of synchronous spiking (short-term synchrony). Common oscillatory input was assessed using coherence analysis and was observed in all conditions for frequencies up to ∼ 5 Hz. Coherence at frequencies up to ∼ 10 Hz was strongest in motor unit pairs recorded from the same GG belly in tongue protrusion. Taken together, our results suggest that cortical drive increases motor unit coordination within but not across GG bellies, while input drive during rest breathing is distributed uniformly to both bellies of the muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.