Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21083094›Full record

ReviewBioanalysis2009

Mechanisms of amine accumulation in, and egress from, lysosomes.

Stephen D B Goldman, Ryan S Funk, Roger A Rajewski, Jeffrey P Krise

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioanalysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional Characterization of the P-Type ATPases ATP13A3 and ATP13A4 as Plasma Membrane Polyamine Transporters.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. TXA11114: Discovery of anAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen D B GoldmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, 2095 Constant Ave., Lawrence, KS 66047, USA.
Ryan S Funk
Roger A Rajewski
Jeffrey P Krise

Funding

Analysis of Intracellular Drug SequestrationR01CA106655 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI KRISE, JEFFREY P · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human body is continuously exposed to small organic molecules containing one or more basic nitrogen atoms. Many of these are endogenous (i.e., neurotransmitters, polyamines and biogenic amines), while others are exogenously supplied in the form of drugs, foods and pollutants. It is well-known that many amines have a strong propensity to specifically and substantially accumulate in highly acidic intracellular compartments, such as lysosomes, through a mechanism referred to as ion trapping. It is also known that cells have acquired the unique ability to sense and respond to amine accumulation in lysosomes in an effort to prevent potential negative consequences associated with hyperaccumulation. We describe here methods that are used to evaluate the dynamics of amine accumulation in, and egress from, lysosomes. Moreover, we highlight specific proteins that are thought to play important roles in these pathways. A theoretical model describing lysosomal amine dynamics is described and shown to adequately fit experimental kinetic data. The implications of this research in understanding and treating disease are discussed.

Indexed as

AminesChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalHumansLysosomesAmines

Identifiers

PMID21083094
PMCPMC3065188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.