ArticleExperimental brain research2011
Alterations in human motor cortex during dual motor task by transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor actions across psychiatric disorders: A research domain criteria (RDoC) perspective.Clinical psychology review · 2024Review
- "Tricking the Brain" Using Immersive Virtual Reality: Modifying the Self-Perception Over Embodied Avatar Influences Motor Cortical Excitability and Action Initiation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- The effects of mobile phone use on walking: a dual task study.BMC research notes · 2019Article
- The aging brain shows less flexible reallocation of cognitive resources during dual-task walking: A mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) study.NeuroImage · 2015Article
- The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.Experimental brain research · 2015Review
- Recalibration of inhibitory control systems during walking-related dual-task interference: a mobile brain-body imaging (MOBI) study.NeuroImage · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine how and whether changes in the primary motor cortex (M1) are affected by dual motor task. We further investigated how dual motor task is dependent on task properties measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS delivered to left M1 during the dual motor task and motor-evoked potential (MEP) were simultaneously evoked in the right FDI, thenar, FCR and ECR muscles. In experiment 1, subjects were asked to simultaneously walk on a treadmill and perform finger prehension. The gait conditions were employed 30, 50 and 80% of maximum walking speed (gait 30%, gait 50% and gait 80%). Conditions for finger prehension while following the visual tracking task varied with force outputs of 5 and 25% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). In experiment 2, the subjects were asked to perform optimal walking synchronized with the finger prehension task with an optimal walking rhythm (2-Hz dual motor task), as well as optimal walking desynchronized with the finger prehension task (0.7-Hz dual motor task). In experiment 1, MEPs were markedly decreased under the gait 50% condition compared with those under the gait 30 and 80% conditions at 5% MVC. In experiment 2, MEPs were markedly decreased with the 2-Hz dual motor task compared with those with the 0.7-Hz dual motor task. Our results suggest that the excitability changes in M1 during the dual motor task were dependent on changes in the gait speed, precision of prehension task and temporal movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21082314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.