Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21082314›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2011

Alterations in human motor cortex during dual motor task by transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Kazumasa Uehara, Toshio Higashi, Shigeo Tanabe, Kenichi Sugawara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kazumasa UeharaRehabilitation Science, Division of Health & Social Work, Graduate School of Health & Social Work Sciences, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 238-8522, Japan. kaz_19pt@yahoo.co.jp
Toshio Higashi
Shigeo Tanabe
Kenichi Sugawara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine how and whether changes in the primary motor cortex (M1) are affected by dual motor task. We further investigated how dual motor task is dependent on task properties measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS delivered to left M1 during the dual motor task and motor-evoked potential (MEP) were simultaneously evoked in the right FDI, thenar, FCR and ECR muscles. In experiment 1, subjects were asked to simultaneously walk on a treadmill and perform finger prehension. The gait conditions were employed 30, 50 and 80% of maximum walking speed (gait 30%, gait 50% and gait 80%). Conditions for finger prehension while following the visual tracking task varied with force outputs of 5 and 25% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). In experiment 2, the subjects were asked to perform optimal walking synchronized with the finger prehension task with an optimal walking rhythm (2-Hz dual motor task), as well as optimal walking desynchronized with the finger prehension task (0.7-Hz dual motor task). In experiment 1, MEPs were markedly decreased under the gait 50% condition compared with those under the gait 30 and 80% conditions at 5% MVC. In experiment 2, MEPs were markedly decreased with the 2-Hz dual motor task compared with those with the 0.7-Hz dual motor task. Our results suggest that the excitability changes in M1 during the dual motor task were dependent on changes in the gait speed, precision of prehension task and temporal movement.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleFingersFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPeriodicityPsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Magnetic StimulationWalkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.