ReviewCurrent oncology reports2011
Tumor profiling: development of prognostic and predictive factors to guide brain tumor treatment.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simple approach for the histomolecular diagnosis of central nervous system gliomas based on 2021 World Health Organization Classification.World journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- A systematic comparison and evaluation of high density exon arrays and RNA-seq technology used to unravel the peripheral blood transcriptome of sickle cell disease.BMC medical genomics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with highly variable outcomes, and diagnosis is largely based on the histological appearance of the tumors. However, the diversity of primary brain tumors has made prognostic determinations based purely on clinicopathologic variables difficult. There is an increasing body of data suggesting a significant amount of molecular diversity accounts for the heterogeneity of clinical observations, such as response to treatment and time to progression. The last decade has witnessed an explosive advance in our knowledge of the molecular genetics of brain tumors, due in large part to the availability of high-throughput profiling techniques and to the completion of the human genome sequencing project. The large amount of data generated by these efforts has enabled the identification of prognostic and predictive factors and helping to identify pathways which are driving tumor growth. Identification of biomarkers will enable better patient stratification and individualization of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21082294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.