ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2010
Atrial-selective drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acacetin-loaded microemulsion for transdermal delivery: preparation, optimization and evaluation.Pharmaceutical biology · 2023Article
- New Strategies for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Computational Modeling of Electrophysiology and Pharmacotherapy of Atrial Fibrillation: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- Tissue-specific effects of acetylcholine in the canine heart.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is accompanied by a high risk of thromboembolic complications necessitating anticoagulation therapy. Arrhythmias have a high tendency to become persistent. Catheter ablation techniques are highly effective in the treatment of AF; however, these procedures are far too costly and time-consuming for the routine treatment of large numbers of AF patients. Moreover, many patients prefer drug treatment although conventional antiarrhythmic drugs are moderately effective and are burdened with severe cardiac and noncardiac side effects. New antifibrillatory drugs developed for the treatment of AF include multichannel blockers with a high degree of atrial selectivity. The rationale of this approach is to induce antiarrhythmic actions only in the atria without conferring proarrhythmic effects in the ventricles.Atrial selective drug action is expected with ion channel blockers targeting ion channels that are expressed predominantly in the atria, i.e., Kv1.5 (I(Kur)), or Kir 3.1 and Kir 3.4 (I(K,ACh)). Na(+) channel blockers that dissociate rapidly may exert atrial selectivity because of subtle differences in atrial and ventricular action potentials. Finally, atrial-selective targets may evolve due to disease-specific processes (e.g., rate-dependent Na(+) channel blockers, selective drugs against constitutively active I(K,ACh) channels).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.