ArticleOptics letters2010
Microlens array recording of localized retinal responses.
Article in Optics letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional optical coherence tomography of retinal photoreceptors.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018Review
- Stimulus-evoked outer segment changes occur before the hyperpolarization of retinal photoreceptors.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
- In vivo optical coherence tomography of stimulus-evoked intrinsic optical signals in mouse retinas.Journal of biomedical optics · 2016Article
- Stimulus-evoked outer segment changes in rod photoreceptors.Journal of biomedical optics · 2016Article
- Article
- Intrinsic optical signal imaging of retinal physiology: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2015Review
- Super-Resolution Scanning Laser Microscopy Based on Virtually Structured Detection.Critical reviews in biomedical engineering · 2015Review
- Breaking diffraction limit of lateral resolution in optical coherence tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2013Article
- Super-resolution scanning laser microscopy through virtually structured detection.Biomedical optics express · 2013Article
- In vivo confocal intrinsic optical signal identification of localized retinal dysfunction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2012Article
- Comparative intrinsic optical signal imaging of wild-type and mutant mouse retinas.Optics express · 2012Article
- Functional imaging of retinal photoreceptors and inner neurons using stimulus-evoked intrinsic optical signals.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012Article
- Two-photon excited autofluorescence imaging of freshly isolated frog retinas.Biomedical optics express · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We designed a rapid functional imager for the parallel recording of localized intrinsic optical signals (IOSs). This imager used a microlens array (MLA)-based illuminator to deliver visible stimulus light and near-infrared (NIR) recording light simultaneously. The parfocal configuration of the stimulus and recording light illumination enabled confocal recording of the stimulus-evoked IOSs. Because the MLA stimulation/recording spots were widely separated on the retina, and only the photoreceptors within the MLA stimulation/recording spots were stimulated, the potential IOS cross talk effect among neighboring retinal areas was minimized. Our experiments revealed robust IOS activities tightly correlated with localized retinal responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.