Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21081929›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2010

A Phase 1b/2 trial of mapatumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A Younes, J M Vose, A D Zelenetz, M R Smith, H A Burris, S M Ansell, J Klein, W Halpern, R Miceli, E Kumm and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A YounesMD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. ayounes@mdanderson.org
J M Vose
A D Zelenetz
M R Smith
H A Burris
S M Ansell
J Klein
W Halpern
R Miceli
E Kumm
N L Fox
M S Czuczman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundwe conducted a multicentre Phase 1b/2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mapatumumab, a fully human agonistic monoclonal antibody to the tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1) in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

methodsforty patients with relapsed or refractory NHL were treated with either 3 or 10 mg kg(-1) mapatumumab every 21 days. In the absence of disease progression or prohibitive toxicity, patients received a maximum of six doses.

resultsmapatumumab was well tolerated, with no patients experiencing drug-related hepatic or other dose-limiting toxicity. Three patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) experienced clinical responses, including two with a complete response and one with a partial response. Immunohistochemistry staining of the TRAIL-R1 suggested that strong staining in tumour specimens did not appear to be a requirement for mapatumumab activity in FL.

conclusionsmapatumumab is safe and has promising clinical activity in patients with FL.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandRecurrenceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedmapatumumabReceptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

Identifiers

PMID21081929
PMCPMC3008610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.