Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21081299›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2011

Exposure assessment in cohort studies of childhood asthma.

Victoria H Arrandale, Michael Brauer, Jeffrey R Brook, Bert Brunekreef, Diane R Gold, Stephanie J London, J David Miller, Halûk Özkaynak, Nola M Ries, Malcolm R Sears and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Scalable combinatorial tools for health disparities research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Victoria H ArrandaleDalla Lana School of Public Health, Gage Occupational and Environmental Health Unit, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael Brauer
Jeffrey R Brook
Bert Brunekreef
Diane R Gold
Stephanie J London
J David Miller
Halûk Özkaynak
Nola M Ries
Malcolm R Sears
Frances S Silverman
Tim K Takaro

Funding

Genetic And Environmental Factors In Childhood Respiratory HealthZIAES049019 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LONDON, STEPHANIE · 2009 to 2025
$6.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe environment is suspected to play an important role in the development of childhood asthma. Cohort studies are a powerful observational design for studying exposure-response relationships, but their power depends in part upon the accuracy of the exposure assessment.

objectiveThe purpose of this paper is to summarize and discuss issues that make accurate exposure assessment a challenge and to suggest strategies for improving exposure assessment in longitudinal cohort studies of childhood asthma and allergies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Exposures of interest need to be prioritized, because a single study cannot measure all potentially relevant exposures. Hypotheses need to be based on proposed mechanisms, critical time windows for effects, prior knowledge of physical, physiologic, and immunologic development, as well as genetic pathways potentially influenced by the exposures. Modifiable exposures are most important from the public health perspective. Given the interest in evaluating gene-environment interactions, large cohort sizes are required, and planning for data pooling across independent studies is critical. Collection of additional samples, possibly through subject participation, will permit secondary analyses. Models combining air quality, environmental, and dose data provide exposure estimates across large cohorts but can still be improved.

conclusionsExposure is best characterized through a combination of information sources. Improving exposure assessment is critical for reducing measurement error and increasing power, which increase confidence in characterization of children at risk, leading to improved health outcomes.

Indexed as

AsthmaChildCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureHumansHypersensitivityLongitudinal StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID21081299
PMCPMC3094407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.