Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21080935›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2010

Merging transcriptomics and metabolomics--advances in breast cancer profiling.

Eldrid Borgan, Beathe Sitter, Ole Christian Lingjærde, Hilde Johnsen, Steinar Lundgren, Tone F Bathen, Therese Sørlie, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Ingrid S Gribbestad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. NMR in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cancer pharmacoinformatics: Databases and analytical tools.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024
    Review
  9. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Precision Oncology via NMR-Based Metabolomics: A Review on Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eldrid BorganDepartment of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Surgery and Cancer, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Beathe Sitter
Ole Christian Lingjærde
Hilde Johnsen
Steinar Lundgren
Tone F Bathen
Therese Sørlie
Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Ingrid S Gribbestad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombining gene expression microarrays and high resolution magic angle spinning magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HR MAS MRS) of the same tissue samples enables comparison of the transcriptional and metabolic profiles of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the potential of combining these two different types of information.

methodsBreast cancer tissue from 46 patients was analyzed by HR MAS MRS followed by gene expression microarrays. Two strategies were used to combine the gene expression and metabolic data; first using multivariate analyses to identify different groups based on gene expression and metabolic data; second correlating levels of specific metabolites to transcripts to suggest new hypotheses of connections between metabolite levels and the underlying biological processes. A parallel study was designed to address experimental issues of combining microarrays and HR MAS MRS.

resultsIn the first strategy, using the microarray data and previously reported molecular classification methods, the majority of samples were classified as luminal A. Three subgroups of luminal A tumors were identified based on hierarchical clustering of the HR MAS MR spectra. The samples in one of the subgroups, designated A2, showed significantly lower glucose and higher alanine levels than the other luminal A samples, suggesting a higher glycolytic activity in these tumors. This group was also enriched for genes annotated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms related to cell cycle and DNA repair. In the second strategy, the correlations between concentrations of myo-inositol, glycine, taurine, glycerophosphocholine, phosphocholine, choline and creatine and all transcripts in the filtered microarray data were investigated. GO-terms related to the extracellular matrix were enriched among the genes that correlated the most to myo-inositol and taurine, while cell cycle related GO-terms were enriched for the genes that correlated the most to choline. Additionally, a subset of transcripts was identified to have slightly altered expression after HR MAS MRS and was therefore removed from all other analyses.

conclusionsCombining transcriptional and metabolic data from the same breast carcinoma sample is feasible and may contribute to a more refined subclassification of breast cancers as well as reveal relations between metabolic and transcriptional levels. See Commentary: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/8/73.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticTranscription, GeneticAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID21080935
PMCPMC2996395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.