Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21080743›Full record

ReviewDrugs2010

Indacaterol: in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Marit D Moen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of inhaled indacaterol in healthy Chinese volunteers.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2015
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marit D MoenAdis, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indacaterol is a long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist that is available in the EU for the maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Indacaterol has a 24-hour bronchodilatory effect, which allows for once-daily administration. The onset of bronchodilation after inhalation of indacaterol is fast, with significant improvements versus placebo seen 5 minutes after inhalation. In four large (n > 400), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase III trials, patients with COPD who received indacaterol 150 or 300 μg once daily had a significantly higher mean trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) than placebo recipients after 12 weeks. Trough FEV₁ differences between indacaterol and placebo recipients were 130-180 mL and exceeded the clinically relevant threshold of 120 mL in all trials. Furthermore, indacaterol recipients had significantly higher mean trough FEV₁ values after 12 weeks than patients who received formoterol, salmeterol or open-label tiotropium. COPD exacerbations and symptoms, and health-related quality of life were also significantly improved for indacaterol versus placebo recipients in some studies. Indacaterol was generally well tolerated by adults with moderate to severe COPD.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAnimalsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicForced Expiratory VolumeHumansIndansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuinolonesVasodilator AgentsAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsindacaterolIndansQuinolonesVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21080743
OpenAlexW2335524308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.