Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21080241›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2011

Update on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Agnes Patzkó, Michael E Shy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A genome-wide association study identifies novel loci for paclitaxel-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy in CALGB 40101.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Wearable Bioelectronics for Home-Based Monitoring and Treatment of Muscle Atrophy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnes PatzkóWayne State University, 421 East Canfield, Elliman Building 3209, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. apatzko@yahoo.com
Michael E Shy
Wayne State University · US

Funding

trainingU54NS065712 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHY, MICHAEL E. · 2009 to 2023
$19.6M
Early and Late Onset CMT1BR01NS041319 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHY, MICHAEL E. · 2001 to 2010
$2.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS041319NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) disease encompasses a genetically heterogeneous group of inherited neuropathies, also known as hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies. CMT results from mutations in more than 40 genes expressed in Schwann cells and neurons causing overlapping phenotypes. The classic CMT phenotype reflects length-dependent axonal degeneration characterized by distal sensory loss and weakness, deep tendon reflex abnormalities, and skeletal deformities. Recent articles have provided insight into the molecular pathogenesis of CMT, which, for the first time, suggest potential therapeutic targets. Although there are currently no effective medications for CMT, multiple clinical trials are ongoing or being planned. This review will focus on the underlying pathomechanisms and diagnostic approaches of CMT and discuss the emerging therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

PhenotypeCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansMutation

Identifiers

PMID21080241
PMCPMC3685483
OpenAlexW2104842054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.