ReviewJournal of neurology2010
Has drug therapy changed the natural history of Parkinson's disease?
Review in Journal of neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The elephant in the room: critical reflections on mortality rates among individuals with Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Urinary Tract Infection in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2022Review
- The effect of a structured medication review on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: The study protocol.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- Can suitable candidates for levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel therapy be identified using current evidence?eNeurologicalSci · 2017Review
- Comparison of Globus Pallidus Interna and Subthalamic Nucleus in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: An Institutional Experience and Review.Parkinson's disease · 2017Review
- An update on the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review examines the effects of drug therapy on the natural history of Parkinson's disease. In terms of modifying the underlying disease process, it is possible that immediate therapy, rather than deferred treatment, can have a positive effect on the underlying disease process. However, it is unlikely that drug therapy has changed mortality from the condition and there is no evidence that it can delay the onset of non-motor features such as dementia and falls. The beneficial effects of drug therapy on the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease are unquestionable, but these are at the expense of short-term dopaminergic side effects, long-term motor complications, and impulse control disorders. Major questions remain regarding which initial therapeutic approach should be taken which may possibly be answered by the ongoing PD MED trial. The beneficial effects of drug therapy on the motor features of Parkinson's disease have had a fundamental impact on the suffering of patients. The mainstay of these therapies continues to be levodopa, although it is now used at lower doses than in the past and in combination with other drug classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.