Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21080181›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica2011

Genome-wide comparison of paired fresh frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gliomas by custom BAC and oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization: facilitating analysis of archival gliomas.

Gayatry Mohapatra, David A Engler, Kristen D Starbuck, James C Kim, Derek C Bernay, George A Scangas, Audrey Rousseau, Tracy T Batchelor, Rebecca A Betensky, David N Louis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gayatry MohapatraDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. gmohapatra@partners.org
David A Engler
Kristen D Starbuck
James C Kim
Derek C Bernay
George A Scangas
Audrey Rousseau
Tracy T Batchelor
Rebecca A Betensky
David N Louis
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBrigham Young University · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Custom array CGH for glioma diagnosis and managementR33CA106695 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LOUIS, DAVID N · 2007 to 2009
$1.0M
Custom array CGH for glioma diagnosis and managementR21CA106695 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LOUIS, DAVID N · 2005 to 2006
$297k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA106695NCI NIH HHS R21/R33 CA106695NCI NIH HHS R33 CA106695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a powerful tool for detecting DNA copy number alterations (CNA). Because diffuse malignant gliomas are often sampled by small biopsies, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks are often the only tissue available for genetic analysis; FFPE tissues are also needed to study the intratumoral heterogeneity that characterizes these neoplasms. In this paper, we present a combination of evaluations and technical advances that provide strong support for the ready use of oligonucleotide aCGH on FFPE diffuse gliomas. We first compared aCGH using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays in 45 paired frozen and FFPE gliomas, and demonstrate a high concordance rate between FFPE and frozen DNA in an individual clone-level analysis of sensitivity and specificity, assuring that under certain array conditions, frozen and FFPE DNA can perform nearly identically. However, because oligonucleotide arrays offer advantages to BAC arrays in genomic coverage and practical availability, we next developed a method of labeling DNA from FFPE tissue that allows efficient hybridization to oligonucleotide arrays. To demonstrate utility in FFPE tissues, we applied this approach to biphasic anaplastic oligoastrocytomas and demonstrate CNA differences between DNA obtained from the two components. Therefore, BAC and oligonucleotide aCGH can be sensitive and specific tools for detecting CNAs in FFPE DNA, and novel labeling techniques enable the routine use of oligonucleotide arrays for FFPE DNA. In combination, these advances should facilitate genome-wide analysis of rare, small and/or histologically heterogeneous gliomas from FFPE tissues.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCell Line, TumorComparative Genomic HybridizationFixativesFormaldehydeFrozen SectionsGenome-Wide Association StudyGliomaHumansOligodendrogliomaParaffin EmbeddingSensitivity and SpecificityFixativesFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID21080181
PMCPMC3059338
OpenAlexW1998215363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.