Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21080159›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2011

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: imaging spectrum of an unusual tumor in 11 cases.

Sirisha Komakula, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Peter Hildenbrand, Laurie Loevner, Richard Hewlett, Karen Salzman, William Couldwell, Chih-ta Lin, Anne Osborn

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pineal Gland Parenchyma Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Imaging of Pineal Region Masses.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuroimaging of paediatric pineal, sellar and suprasellar tumours: a guide to differential diagnosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Distinguishing between germinomas and pineal cell tumors on MR imaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sirisha KomakulaDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, #1A071, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA. komakulas@gmail.com
Monika Warmuth-Metz
Peter Hildenbrand
Laurie Loevner
Richard Hewlett
Karen Salzman
William Couldwell
Chih-ta Lin
Anne Osborn
University of Utah · USLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) was recognized in the 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification as a new pineal parenchymal neoplasm, intermediate in malignancy (WHO grade II or III) between pineocytoma (grade I) and pineoblastoma (grade IV). The imaging spectrum of this new tumor has not been previously delineated. We describe the imaging spectrum in 11 pathologically proven PPTIDs and identify findings that may suggest the preoperative diagnosis of this newly recognized entity.

methodsElectronic medical records over the last 9 years and teaching files between the years 1985 and 1995 were searched for atypical pineal lesions. Additional cases were added from the teaching files of contributing authors.

resultsImaging studies in nine patients (9/11) showed bulky, aggressive pineal region masses with local brain invasion; two patients (2/11) demonstrated circumscribed pineal masses. Two patients had spinal metastases at presentation. On computed tomography (CT), five patients had classic "exploded" calcifications characteristic of pineal parenchymal tumors. All tumors were heterogeneously hypointense on T1WIs and heterogeneously hyperintense on T2WIs. Post-contrast scans showed marked heterogeneous (10/11) or uniform (1/11) enhancement. Cystic foci were identified in eight cases. Intratumoral hemorrhage was present in one case.

conclusionWhile no singular neuroimaging feature is pathognomonic of PPTID, these tumors are usually larger, demonstrate local invasion, and appear much more heterogeneous than pineocytoma. Because PPTIDs have a higher grade and increased potential for recurrence as compared to pineocytomas, it is important to consider this diagnosis as shorter follow-up, and adjuvant therapy may be indicated in selected cases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPinealomaTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID21080159
OpenAlexW2160560311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.