Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21080073›Full record

ReviewOrigins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life2011

Toward understanding protocell mechanosensation.

Daniel Balleza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mechanosensitive aquaporins.Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Review
  4. Aquaporin Gating: A New Twist to Unravel Permeation through Water Channels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel BallezaUnidad de Biofísica, CSIC-UPV/EHU, Universidad del País Vasco, Barrio Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Spain. dballeza.uwisc@gmail.com
Fundación Biofísica Bizkaia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanosensitive (MS) channels can prevent bacterial bursting during hypo-osmotic shocks by responding to increases in lateral tension at the membrane level through an integrated and coordinated opening mechanism. Mechanical regulation in protocells could have been one of the first mechanisms to evolve in order to preserve their integrity against changing environmental conditions. How has the rich functional diversity found in present cells been created throughout evolution, and what did the primordial MS channels look like? This review has been written with the aim of identifying which factors may have been important for the appearance of the first osmotic valve in a prebiotic context, and what this valve may have been like. It highlights the mechanical properties of lipid bilayers, the association of peptides as aggregates in membranes, and the conservation of sequence motifs as central aspects to understand the evolution of proteins that gate below the tension required for spontaneous pore formation and membrane rupture. The arguments developed here apply to both MscL and MscS homologs, but could be valid to mechano-susceptible proteins in general.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAlamethicinArtificial CellsCell MembraneEvolution, MolecularIon ChannelsLipid BilayersModels, MolecularPeptidesPhospholipidsAlamethicinIon ChannelsLipid BilayersPeptidesPhospholipids

Identifiers

PMID21080073
OpenAlexW2043751742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.