Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21079997›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2011

Uncovering hidden variance: pair-wise SNP analysis accounts for additional variance in nicotine dependence.

Robert C Culverhouse, Nancy L Saccone, Jerry A Stitzel, Jen C Wang, Joseph H Steinbach, Alison M Goate, Tae-Hwi Schwantes-An, Richard A Grucza, Victoria L Stevens, Laura J Bierut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genome-wide DNA methylation differences in nucleus accumbens of smokers vs. nonsmokers.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effect of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor genes (CHRN) on longitudinal cigarettes per day in adolescents and young adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert C CulverhouseDivision of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA. rculverh@wustl.edu
Nancy L Saccone
Jerry A Stitzel
Jen C Wang
Joseph H Steinbach
Alison M Goate
Tae-Hwi Schwantes-An
Richard A Grucza
Victoria L Stevens
Laura J Bierut

Funding

The Collaborative Genetic Study of Nicotine DependenceP01CA089392 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA J. · 2001 to 2012
$17.3M
Aceytylcholine Receptor FunctionR01NS022356 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEINBACH, JOSEPH H. · 1985 to 2013
$3.8M
Computational Methods to Detect EpistasisK25GM069590 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CULVERHOUSE, ROBERT C · 2004 to 2008
$607k
GENETIC INTERACTIONS CONTRIBUTING TO ALCOHOL AND NICOTINE DEPENDENCER03DA023166 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CULVERHOUSE, ROBERT C · 2008 to 2009
$152k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA089392NCI NIH HHS P01 CA89392NHGRI NIH HHS HHSN268200782096CNIDA NIH HHS R03 DA023166NIGMS NIH HHS K25 GM069590NIGMS NIH HHS K25 GM69590NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS022356PHS HHS HHSN268200782096PHS HHS HHSN271200477451CPHS HHS HHSN271200477471C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from genome-wide association studies of complex traits account for only a modest proportion of the trait variance predicted to be due to genetics. We hypothesize that joint analysis of polymorphisms may account for more variance. We evaluated this hypothesis on a case-control smoking phenotype by examining pairs of nicotinic receptor single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using the Restricted Partition Method (RPM) on data from the Collaborative Genetic Study of Nicotine Dependence (COGEND). We found evidence of joint effects that increase explained variance. Four signals identified in COGEND were testable in independent American Cancer Society (ACS) data, and three of the four signals replicated. Our results highlight two important lessons: joint effects that increase the explained variance are not limited to loci displaying substantial main effects, and joint effects need not display a significant interaction term in a logistic regression model. These results suggest that the joint analyses of variants may indeed account for part of the genetic variance left unexplained by single SNP analyses. Methodologies that limit analyses of joint effects to variants that demonstrate association in single SNP analyses, or require a significant interaction term, will likely miss important joint effects.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, NicotinicSmokingTobacco Use DisorderReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID21079997
PMCPMC3030551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.