Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21079908›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2011

[Botulinum toxin in the treatment of adult spasticity. An interdisciplinary German 10-point consensus 2010].

J Wissel, M auf dem Brinke, M Hecht, C Herrmann, M Huber, S Mehnert, I Reuter, A Schramm, A Stenner, C van der Ven and 2 more

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Patient Registry of Spasticity Care World: Data Analysis Based on Physician Experience.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2017
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

J WisselKliniken Beelitz GmbH, Paracelsusring 6 A, 14547, Beelitz-Heilstätten. wissel@rehaklinik-beelitz.de
M auf dem Brinke
M Hecht
C Herrmann
M Huber
S Mehnert
I Reuter
A Schramm
A Stenner
C van der Ven
M Winterholler
A Kupsch
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEAsklepios Kliniken Hamburg · DEAsklepios Kliniken Schildautal · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DENeurologisches Fachkrankenhaus für Bewegungsstörungen/Parkinson · DETherapiezentrum Burgau · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity is one of the major causes of functional impairment in adults with lesions of the central nervous system. For instance, approximately 30% of post-stroke patients suffer from different degrees of spasticity with possible consecutive impairments. Numerous studies or meta-analyses showed that local injections of botulinum toxin in spastic muscles lead to dose-dependent reduction in muscle tone and improvement of passive movements (e. g. facilitated care), especially following repeated injections.However, country-specific regulations and patient-remote administration in German health care often do not allow adequate provision of this therapy. Thus, the present consensus statement based on the EBM analyses of the published international literature tries to highlight recent advances and the standard in the field of local spasticity treatment, aiming to facilitate communication between the decision makers and German reimbursement institutions in health care. Prior to initiation of BoNT-A injections, patient-oriented goals should be identified in a multiprofessional context to assure realistic goals for this specific treatment and patient expectations. In Germany for the treatment of focal spasticity following stroke three products have been approved: Botox® (Pharm Allergan, Ettlingen), Dysport® (Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen) and Xeomin® (Merz Pharma, Frankfurt/Main). For all preparations safety has been repeatedly shown. Functional improvements have also been illustrated for selected patients concerning hand/arm function and gait. The dose per muscle and the selection of muscles to be injected have to be individualized according to the patient's symptoms and should be accompanied by modern neurorehabilitative therapies such as redression or repetitive activation of the injected and antagonistic muscles.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAnti-Dyskinesia AgentsBotulinum ToxinsGermanyHumansMuscle SpasticityNeurologyAnti-Dyskinesia AgentsBotulinum Toxins

Identifiers

PMID21079908
OpenAlexW1857959989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.