Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21079744›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Microarray analysis reveals distinct gene expression profiles among different tumor histology, stage and disease outcomes in endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia, Dan Wang, Joshua Kesterson, Kimberly Clark, Laketa Monhollen, Kunle Odunsi, Shashikant Lele, Song Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulette Mhawech-FaucegliaDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States of America. pmhawech1@yahoo.com
Dan Wang
Joshua Kesterson
Kimberly Clark
Laketa Monhollen
Kunle Odunsi
Shashikant Lele
Song Liu
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Research Training in Surgical OncologyT32CA108456 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI YENDAMURI, SAIKRISHNA · 2006 to 2020
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and little is known about the underlying mechanism of stage and disease outcomes. The goal of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes (DEG) between late vs. early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC) and uterine serous carcinoma (USC), as well as between disease outcomes in each of the two histological subtypes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDING: Gene expression profiles of 20 cancer samples were analyzed (EAC = 10, USC = 10) using the human genome wide illumina bead microarrays. There was little overlap in the DEG sets between late vs. early stages in EAC and USC, and there was an insignificant overlap in DEG sets between good and poor prognosis in EAC and USC. Remarkably, there was no overlap between the stage-derived DEGs and the prognosis-derived DEGs for each of the two histological subtypes. Further functional annotation of differentially expressed genes showed that the composition of enriched function terms were different among different DEG sets. Gene expression differences for selected genes of various stages and outcomes were confirmed by qRT-PCR with a high validation rate.

conclusionThis data, although preliminary, suggests that there might be involvement of distinct groups of genes in tumor progression (late vs. early stage) in each of the EAC and USC. It also suggests that these genes are different from those involved in tumor outcome (good vs. poor prognosis). These involved genes, once clinically verified, may be important for predicting tumor progression and tumor outcome.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingCarcinoma, EndometrioidCluster AnalysisCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm StagingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionUterine Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21079744
PMCPMC2975707
OpenAlexW2095232069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.