Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21079633›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Cellular mechanisms that control mistranslation.

Noah M Reynolds, Beth A Lazazzera, Michael Ibba

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Ribosomes: from conserved origin to functional/medical mobility and heterogeneity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Single-Molecule Studies of Cognate and Near-Cognate Elongation in anbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Engineered mRNA-ribosome fusions for facile biosynthesis of selenoproteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Alternative CUG Codon Usage in the Halotolerant YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noah M ReynoldsDepartment of Microbiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Beth A Lazazzera
Michael Ibba

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mistranslation broadly encompasses the introduction of errors during any step of protein synthesis, leading to the incorporation of an amino acid that is different from the one encoded by the gene. Recent research has vastly enhanced our understanding of the mechanisms that control mistranslation at the molecular level and has led to the discovery that the rates of mistranslation in vivo are not fixed but instead are variable. In this Review we describe the different steps in translation quality control and their variations under different growth conditions and between species though a comparison of in vitro and in vivo findings. This provides new insights as to why mistranslation can have both positive and negative effects on growth and viability.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisAmino AcidsAnimalsCell Physiological PhenomenaHumansProtein FoldingRNA, TransferAmino AcidsRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID21079633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.