ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010
Comparative genomics of clinical and environmental Vibrio mimicus.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole Genome Characterisation of Non-O1/Non-O139Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Global transmission and distribution of phage-encoded cholera toxin genes constrained by toxin-repression genes and anti-phage defense systems.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes and SNPs Linked toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Multiscale comparative pathogenomic analysis of Vibrio anguillarum linking serotype diversity, genomic plasticity and pathogenicity.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetic Characterization of a Novel Retron Element Isolated from Vibrio mimicus.Microbiology and immunology · 2025Article
- Occurrence of virulence determinants in vibrio cholerae, vibrio mimicus, vibrio alginolyticus, and vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from important water resources of Eastern Cape, South Africa.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Seafood-Associated Outbreak of ctx-Negative Vibrio mimicus Causing Cholera-Like Illness, Florida, USA.Emerging infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Transcriptional landscape ofMicrobial genomics · 2023Article
- Exploring the dynamics of toxigenic environmental Vibrio mimicus and its comparative analysis with Vibrio cholerae of the southern Gangetic delta.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Prevalence, Antibiotic-Resistance, and Growth Profile ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Population Analysis of Vibrio cholerae in Aquatic Reservoirs Reveals a Novel Sister Species (Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Core and Accessory Genome Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Novel Cholera Toxin Variant and ToxT Regulon in EnvironmentalApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Occurrence and significance of pathogenicity and fitness islands in environmental vibrios.AMB Express · 2018Article
- Maintenance of multipartite genome system and its functional significance in bacteria.Journal of genetics · 2018Review
- Review
- Article
- Characterization of Vibrio cholerae Strains Isolated from the Nigerian Cholera Outbreak in 2010.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Molecular and Genomic Characterization of Vibrio mimicus Isolated from a Frozen Shrimp Processing Facility in Mexico.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Whether Vibrio mimicus is a variant of Vibrio cholerae or a separate species has been the subject of taxonomic controversy. A genomic analysis was undertaken to resolve the issue. The genomes of V. mimicus MB451, a clinical isolate, and VM223, an environmental isolate, comprise ca. 4,347,971 and 4,313,453 bp and encode 3,802 and 3,290 ORFs, respectively. As in other vibrios, chromosome I (C-I) predominantly contains genes necessary for growth and viability, whereas chromosome II (C-II) bears genes for adaptation to environmental change. C-I harbors many virulence genes, including some not previously reported in V. mimicus, such as mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA), and enterotoxigenic hemolysin (HlyA); C-II encodes a variant of Vibrio pathogenicity island 2 (VPI-2), and Vibrio seventh pandemic island II (VSP-II) cluster of genes. Extensive genomic rearrangement in C-II indicates it is a hot spot for evolution and genesis of speciation for the genus Vibrio. The number of virulence regions discovered in this study (VSP-II, MSHA, HlyA, type IV pilin, PilE, and integron integrase, IntI4) with no notable difference in potential virulence genes between clinical and environmental strains suggests these genes also may play a role in the environment and that pathogenic strains may arise in the environment. Significant genome synteny with prototypic pre-seventh pandemic strains of V. cholerae was observed, and the results of phylogenetic analysis support the hypothesis that, in the course of evolution, V. mimicus and V. cholerae diverged from a common ancestor with a prototypic sixth pandemic genomic backbone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.