Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21078844›Full record

ReviewInfection and immunity2011

Vaccination against Chlamydia genital infection utilizing the murine C. muridarum model.

Christina M Farris, Richard P Morrison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and immunity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Structural Assessment ofVaccines · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Vaccines: Underlying Principles of Design and Testing.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  20. Expert review of vaccines · 2021
    Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christina M FarrisDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, Slot 511, Little Rock, AR 72205-7194, USA.
Richard P Morrison

Funding

IMMUNITY TO CHLAMYDIAL GENITAL INFECTIONR01AI038991 · NIAID · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MORRISON, RICHARD P. · 1996 to 2009
$2.8M
Immunity to Chlamydial Genital InfectionR56AI038991 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MORRISON, RICHARD P. · 2005 to 2005
$363k
NIAID NIH HHS AI-038991NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI038991NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI038991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection is a worldwide public health problem, and considerable effort has been expended on developing an efficacious vaccine. The murine model of C. muridarum genital infection has been extremely useful for identification of protective immune responses and in vaccine development. Although a number of immunogenic antigens have been assessed for their ability to induce protection, the majority of studies have utilized the whole organism, the major outer membrane protein (MOMP), or the chlamydial protease-like activity factor (CPAF). These antigens, alone and in combination with a variety of immunostimulatory adjuvants, have induced various levels of protection against infectious challenge, ranging from minimal to nearly sterilizing immunity. Understanding of the mechanisms of natural infection-based immunity and advances in adjuvant biology have resulted in studies that are increasingly successful, but a vaccine licensed for use in humans has not yet been brought to fruition. Here we review immunity to chlamydial genital infection and vaccine development using the C. muridarum model.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia muridarumDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceBacterial Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21078844
PMCPMC3067520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.