ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
An improved method for scoring protein-protein interactions using semantic similarity within the gene ontology.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphoproteomic profiling highlights CDC42 and CDK2 as key players in the regulation of the TGF-β pathway in ALMS1 and BBS1 knockout models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Convergent pairs of highly transcribed genes restrict chromatin looping in Dictyostelium discoideum.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Identification of Five NK Cell-Related Hub Genes in COPD Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- simona: a comprehensive R package for semantic similarity analysis on bio-ontologies.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- GOTermViewer: Visualization of Gene Ontology Enrichment in Multiple Differential Gene Expression Analyses.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Article
- Integrated systems biology approach identifies gene targets for endothelial dysfunction.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- Cross-phyla protein annotation by structural prediction and alignment.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Large-scale phage-based screening reveals extensive pan-viral mimicry of host short linear motifs.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Genome-wide identification of the opsin protein inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of gene ontology-based semantic similarity measurements for the application of identifying essential proteins.PloS one · 2023Article
- Computational modeling of human-nCoV protein-protein interaction network.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2022Article
- A More Female-Characterized Resting-State Brain: Graph Similarity Analyses of Sex Influence on the Human Brain Intrinsic Functional Network.Brain topography · 2022Article
- Computational models for prediction of protein-protein interaction in rice andFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- HiG2Vec: hierarchical representations of Gene Ontology and genes in the Poincaré ball.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Identification of genes associated with sudden cardiac death: a network- and pathway-based approach.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- A scheme for inferring viral-host associations based on codon usage patterns identifies the most affected signaling pathways during COVID-19.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- Large-Scale Protein Interactions Prediction by Multiple Evidence Analysis Associated With an In-Silico Curation Strategy.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Discovery and Validation of Key Biomarkers Based on Immune Infiltrates in Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The Synergistic Effects of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid and Vorinostat in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Inter-protein residue covariation information unravels physically interacting protein dimers.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSemantic similarity measures are useful to assess the physiological relevance of protein-protein interactions (PPIs). They quantify similarity between proteins based on their function using annotation systems like the Gene Ontology (GO). Proteins that interact in the cell are likely to be in similar locations or involved in similar biological processes compared to proteins that do not interact. Thus the more semantically similar the gene function annotations are among the interacting proteins, more likely the interaction is physiologically relevant. However, most semantic similarity measures used for PPI confidence assessment do not consider the unequal depth of term hierarchies in different classes of cellular location, molecular function, and biological process ontologies of GO and thus may over-or under-estimate similarity.
resultsWe describe an improved algorithm, Topological Clustering Semantic Similarity (TCSS), to compute semantic similarity between GO terms annotated to proteins in interaction datasets. Our algorithm, considers unequal depth of biological knowledge representation in different branches of the GO graph. The central idea is to divide the GO graph into sub-graphs and score PPIs higher if participating proteins belong to the same sub-graph as compared to if they belong to different sub-graphs.
conclusionsThe TCSS algorithm performs better than other semantic similarity measurement techniques that we evaluated in terms of their performance on distinguishing true from false protein interactions, and correlation with gene expression and protein families. We show an average improvement of 4.6 times the F1 score over Resnik, the next best method, on our Saccharomyces cerevisiae PPI dataset and 2 times on our Homo sapiens PPI dataset using cellular component, biological process and molecular function GO annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.