Trial reportInternational wound journal2011
Regenerating matrix-based therapy for chronic wound healing: a prospective within-subject pilot study.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03739255 (Treatment of Postoperative Discomfort/Pain and Facilitation of Corneal Reepithelialization After Photorefractive Keratectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Postoperative Discomfort/Pain and Facilitation of Corneal Reepithelialization After Photorefractive Keratectomy
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized controlled trial demonstrates the benefit of RGTA® based matrix therapy to treat tendinopathies in racing horses.PloS one · 2018Trial
- A Prospective Cohort Study of Hard-to-Heal Chronic Foot and Leg Wounds Followed for up to 20 Weeks After Initiation of ReGenerating Tissue Agents (RGTA) Technology as an Add-on to Optimal Local Care.International wound journal · 2026Article
- From Native Glycosaminoglycans to Mimetics: Design, Mechanisms, and Biomedical Applications.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Low Temperature Plasma Jet Treatment Promotes Skin Wound Healing by Enhancing Cell Proliferation via the PI3K-AKT and AMPK Pathways.International wound journal · 2025Article
- First-Intention Incisional Wound Healing in Dogs and Cats: A Controlled Trial of Dermapliq and Manuka Honey.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Case Reports for Topical Treatment of Corneal Ulcers with a New Matrix Therapy Agent or RGTAVeterinary sciences · 2019Article
- RGTAGlycoconjugate journal · 2017Review
- Corneal matrix repair therapy with the regenerating agent in neurotrophic persistent epithelial defects.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Refractory sickle cell leg ulcer: is heparan sulphate a new hope?International wound journal · 2016Article
- Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome: review of the literature and case report of chronic ulcer treatment with heparan sulphate (Cacipliq20®).International wound journal · 2015Review
- Chronic wounds - is cellular 'reception' at fault? Examining integrins and intracellular signalling.International wound journal · 2013Article
- Propolis modulates vitronectin, laminin, and heparan sulfate/heparin expression during experimental burn healing.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2012Article
- Article
- Matrix regenerative therapy.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether a skin-specific bioengineered regenerating agent (RGTA) heparan sulphate mimetic (CACIPLIQ20) improves chronic wound healing. The design of this article is a prospective within-subject study. The setting was an urban hospital. Patients were 16 African-American individuals (mean age 42 years) with 22 wounds (mean duration 2.5 years) because of either pressure, diabetic, vascular or burn wounds. Two participants each were lost to follow-up or removed because of poor compliance, resulting in 18 wounds analysed. Sterile gauze was soaked with CACIPLIQ20 saline solution, placed on the wound for 5 min, then removed twice weekly for 4 weeks. Wounds were otherwise treated according to the standard of care. Twenty-two percent of wounds fully healed during the treatment period. Wounds showed a 15.2-18.1% decrease in wound size as measured by the vision engineering research group (VERG) digital wound measurement system and total PUSH scores, respectively, at 4 weeks (P = 0.014 and P = 0.003). At 8 weeks there was an 18-26% reduction in wound size (P = 0.04) in the remaining patients. Wound-related pain measured by the visual analogue pain scale and the wound pain scale declined 60% (P = 0.024) and 70% (P = 0.001), respectively. Patient and clinician satisfaction remained positive throughout the treatment period. It is concluded that treatment with CACIPLIQ20 significantly improved wound-related pain and may facilitate wound healing. Patient and clinician satisfaction remained high throughout the trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.