Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21078132›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2011

Regenerating matrix-based therapy for chronic wound healing: a prospective within-subject pilot study.

Suzanne L Groah, Alexander Libin, Miriam Spungen, Kim-Loan Nguyen, Earthaleen Woods, Marjan Nabili, Jessica Ramella-Roman, Denis Barritault

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03739255 (Treatment of Postoperative Discomfort/Pain and Facilitation of Corneal Reepithelialization After Photorefractive Keratectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03739255 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Postoperative Discomfort/Pain and Facilitation of Corneal Reepithelialization After Photorefractive Keratectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSynsLaser Kirurgi ASRan2020 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsCorneal ErosionArmsCacicol20, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RGTAGlycoconjugate journal · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Matrix regenerative therapy.Romanian journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne L GroahSCI Research Center, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA. Suzanne.L.Groah@Medstar.net
Alexander Libin
Miriam Spungen
Kim-Loan Nguyen
Earthaleen Woods
Marjan Nabili
Jessica Ramella-Roman
Denis Barritault
MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital · USCatholic University of America · USOTR3 (France) · FRVirginia Hospital Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether a skin-specific bioengineered regenerating agent (RGTA) heparan sulphate mimetic (CACIPLIQ20) improves chronic wound healing. The design of this article is a prospective within-subject study. The setting was an urban hospital. Patients were 16 African-American individuals (mean age 42 years) with 22 wounds (mean duration 2.5 years) because of either pressure, diabetic, vascular or burn wounds. Two participants each were lost to follow-up or removed because of poor compliance, resulting in 18 wounds analysed. Sterile gauze was soaked with CACIPLIQ20 saline solution, placed on the wound for 5 min, then removed twice weekly for 4 weeks. Wounds were otherwise treated according to the standard of care. Twenty-two percent of wounds fully healed during the treatment period. Wounds showed a 15.2-18.1% decrease in wound size as measured by the vision engineering research group (VERG) digital wound measurement system and total PUSH scores, respectively, at 4 weeks (P = 0.014 and P = 0.003). At 8 weeks there was an 18-26% reduction in wound size (P = 0.04) in the remaining patients. Wound-related pain measured by the visual analogue pain scale and the wound pain scale declined 60% (P = 0.024) and 70% (P = 0.001), respectively. Patient and clinician satisfaction remained positive throughout the treatment period. It is concluded that treatment with CACIPLIQ20 significantly improved wound-related pain and may facilitate wound healing. Patient and clinician satisfaction remained high throughout the trial.

Indexed as

BandagesAdministration, TopicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSulfatasesTreatment OutcomeVaricose UlcerWound Healingheparan sulfate sulfataseSulfatases

Identifiers

PMID21078132
PMCPMC7950993
OpenAlexW2016335636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.