Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21077843›Full record

ReviewBiology of the cell2010

How ubiquitination and autophagy participate in the regulation of the cell response to bacterial infection.

Nicolas Dupont, Nassima Temime-Smaali, Frank Lafont

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of the cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Autophagy and Bacterial infections.Autophagy reports · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Roles of Autophagy in Oxidative Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Alterations of theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cell death and autophagy in tuberculosis.Seminars in immunology · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas DupontCellular Microbiology of Infectious Pathogens, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, F-59019, France.
Nassima Temime-Smaali
Frank Lafont

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial infection relies on the micro-organism's ability to orchestrate the host's cell signalling such that the immune response is not activated. Conversely, the host cell has dedicated signalling pathways for coping with intrusions by pathogens. The autophagy of foreign micro-organisms (known as xenophagy) has emerged as one of the most powerful of these pathways, although the triggering mode remains largely unknown. In the present paper, we discuss the role that certain post-translational modifications (primarily ubiquitination) may play in the activation of xenophagy and how some bacteria have evolved mechanisms to subvert or hijack this process. In particular, we address the role played by P62/SQSTM1 (sequestosome 1). Finally, we discuss how autophagy can be subverted to eliminate bacteria-induced danger signals.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAutophagyBacterial InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansProtein FoldingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSequestosome-1 ProteinSignal TransductionSumoylationUbiquitinationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingSequestosome-1 ProteinSQSTM1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21077843
PMCPMC2975374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.