Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21077566›Full record

Trial reportHuman factors2010

Ergonomic factors related to drop-off detection with the long cane: effects of cane tips and techniques.

Dae Shik Kim, Robert S Wall Emerson, Amy B Curtis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human factors, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomechanics of Long Cane Use.Journal of visual impairment & blindness · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of Cane Technique on Obstacle Detection with the Long Cane.Journal of visual impairment & blindness · 2014
    Article
  8. Effect of Cane Length on Drop-off Detection Performance.Journal of visual impairment & blindness · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dae Shik KimWestern Michigan University, Department of Blindness and Low Vision Studies, 1903 W. Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, MI 49002-5218, USA. dae.kim@wmich.edu
Robert S Wall Emerson
Amy B Curtis
Western Michigan University · US

Funding

Blind Pedestrians' Access to Complex IntersectionsR01EY012894 · NEI · WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI LONG, RICHARD G · 2007 to 2011
$4.7M
NEI NIH HHS 2R01 EY12894-07NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the effect of cane tips and cane techniques on drop-off detection with the long cane.

backgroundBlind pedestrians depend on a long cane to detect drop-offs. Missing a drop-off may result in falls or collision with moving vehicles in the street. Although cane tips appear to affect a cane user's ability to detect drop-offs, few experimental studies have examined such effect.

methodA repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study. Participants were 17 adults who were legally blind and had no other disabilities. Participants attempted to detect the drop-offs of varied depths using different cane tips and cane techniques.

resultsDrop-off detection rates were similar between the marshmallow tip (77.0%) and the marshmallow roller tip (79.4%) when both tips were used with the constant contact technique, p = .294. However, participants detected drop-offs at a significantly higher percentage when they used the constant contact technique with the marshmallow roller tip (79.4%) than when they used the two-point touch technique with the marshmallow tip (63.2%), p < .001.

conclusionThe constant contact technique used with a marshmallow roller tip (perceived as a less advantageous tip) was more effective than the two-point touch technique used with a marshmallow tip (perceived as a more advantageous tip) in detecting drop-offs. APPLICATION: The findings of the study may help cane users and orientation and mobility specialists select appropriate cane techniques and cane tips in accordance with the cane user's characteristics and the nature of the travel environment.

Indexed as

CanesErgonomicsSelf-Help DevicesTouchAccidental FallsAdultAgedBlindnessEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID21077566
PMCPMC3013374
OpenAlexW2010441020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.