Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21076836›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2011

Comparison of predictive methods and biological validation for qPCR reference genes in sunflower leaf senescence transcript analysis.

Paula Fernandez, Julio A Di Rienzo, Sebastián Moschen, Guillermo A A Dosio, Luis A N Aguirrezábal, H Esteban Hopp, Norma Paniego, Ruth A Heinz

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paula FernandezInstituto de Biotecnología, CICVyA, INTA Castelar, Las Cabañas y Los Reseros, (1686) Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina. pfernandez@cnia.inta.gov.ar
Julio A Di Rienzo
Sebastián Moschen
Guillermo A A Dosio
Luis A N Aguirrezábal
H Esteban Hopp
Norma Paniego
Ruth A Heinz
National University of Mar del Plata · ARFundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales · ARNational Agricultural Technology Institute · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection and validation of reference genes constitute a key point for gene expression analysis based on qPCR, requiring efficient normalization approaches. In this work, the expression profiles of eight genes were evaluated to identify novel reference genes for transcriptional studies associated to the senescence process in sunflower. Three alternative strategies were applied for the evaluation of gene expression stability in leaves of different ages and exposed to different treatments affecting the senescence process: algorithms implemented in geNorm, BestKeeper software, and the fitting of a statistical linear mixed model (LMModel). The results show that geNorm suggested the use of all combined genes, although identifying α-TUB1 as the most stable expressing gene. BestKeeper revealed α-TUB and β-TUB as stable genes, scoring β-TUB as the most stable one. The statistical LMModel identified α-TUB, actin, PEP, and EF-1α as stable genes in this order. The model-based approximation allows not only the estimation of systematic changes in gene expression, but also the identification of sources of random variation through the estimation of variance components, considering the experimental design applied. Validation of α-TUB and EF-1α as reference genes for expression studies of three sunflower senescence associated genes showed that the first one was more stable for the assayed conditions. We conclude that, when biological replicates are available, LMModel allows a more reliable selection under the assayed conditions. This study represents the first analysis of identification and validation of genuine reference genes for use as internal control in qPCR expression studies in sunflower, experimentally validated throughout six different controlled leaf senescence conditions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantAlgorithmsDNA, ComplementaryGenes, PlantHelianthusPeptide Elongation Factor 1Plant LeavesReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSoftwareTranscription, GeneticTubulinDNA, ComplementaryPeptide Elongation Factor 1RNA, MessengerTubulin

Identifiers

PMID21076836
OpenAlexW1968876144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.