Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21076468›Full record

ReviewOncogene2011

The ecology of brain tumors: lessons learned from neurofibromatosis-1.

W W Pong, D H Gutmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantitative assessment of the association between XRCC3 C18607T polymorphism and glioma risk.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ribosome profiling reveals a cell-type-specific translational landscape in brain tumors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review: insights gained from modelling high-grade glioma in the mouse.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2012
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W W PongDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
D H Gutmann
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Targeting Stoma-Tumor Co-Dependency for Glioma TherapyU01CA141549 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GUTMANN, DAVID H · 2009 to 2013
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01-CA141549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, cancer studies have primarily focused on mutations that activate growth or survival pathways in susceptible pre-neoplastic/neoplastic cells. However, recent research has revealed a critical role for non-neoplastic cells within the tumor microenvironment in the process of cancer formation and progression. In addition, the existence of regional and developmental variations in susceptible cell types and supportive microenvironments support a model of tumorigenesis in which the dynamic symbiotic relationship between neoplastic and non-neoplastic cell types dictate where and when cancers form and grow. In this review, we highlight advances in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) genetically engineered mouse brain tumor (glioma) modeling to reveal how cellular and molecular heterogeneity in both the pre-neoplastic/neoplastic and non-neoplastic cellular compartments contribute to gliomagenesis and glioma growth.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Transformation, NeoplasticExtracellular MatrixHumansMiceNeurofibromatosis 1Stromal CellsTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID21076468
OpenAlexW2072550815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.