Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21076286›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2011

Decreased mortality resulting from a multicomponent intervention in a tertiary care medical intensive care unit.

Giora Netzer, Xinggang Liu, Carl Shanholtz, Anthony Harris, Avelino Verceles, Theodore J Iwashyna

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Teamwork in the intensive care unit.The American psychologist
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giora NetzerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. gnetzer@medicine.umaryland.edu
Xinggang Liu
Carl Shanholtz
Anthony Harris
Avelino Verceles
Theodore J Iwashyna
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Clinical Research Career Development (RMI)K12RR023250 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHULDINER, ALAN R. · 2005 to 2009
$13.3M
K24 Clinical Research in Antimicrobial Resistance and Hospital EpidemiologyK24AI079040 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HARRIS, ANTHONY D · 2009 to 2018
$1.8M
The structure and outcomes of critical care transfer networkK08HL091249 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI IWASHYNA, THEODORE J · 2008 to 2012
$661k
NCRR NIH HHS 5K12RR023250-03NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR023250NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL091249NIAID NIH HHS 1K24AI079040-01A1NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI079040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether a multicomponent intervention, particularly increasing staff, can achieve reductions in patient mortality in an already high-intensity, Leapfrog-compliant medical intensive care unit.

designRetrospective, observational study.

settingMedical intensive care unit of a tertiary care, academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 1,263 patients admitted between April 19, 2004 and April 18, 2006 (before the organizational change) were compared with 2,424 patients admitted between September 5, 2006 and September 4, 2008.

interventionsA multicomponent intervention including the physical move from a 10-bed to a 29-bed medical intensive care unit with larger patient rooms, the initiation of 24-hr critical care specialist coverage in the medical intensive care unit, an increase in the respiratory therapist:patient ratio, and the addition of a clinical pharmacist to the multidisciplinary team. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsMeasurements were made based on mortality in the intensive care unit and in-hospital. Patient comorbidity as measured by the Charlson score did not change after the intervention (2.7 ± 2.7 vs. 2.8 ± 2.6, p = .62), nor did the acuity of illness as measured by the case mix index (3.0 ± 3.7 vs. 3.1 ± 3.8, p = .69). The unadjusted medical intensive care unit mortality decreased from 18.4% to 14.9% (p = .006), as did in-hospital mortality (from 25.8% to 21.7%, p = .005). The reduction in medical intensive care unit mortality was consistent in the multivariable regression with adjustment for multiple possible confounders (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.91, p = .003), as was the reduction in hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.88, p = .001). In mechanically ventilated patients, there was an increase in median 28-day ventilator-free days (21, interquartile range 0-25 vs. 22, interquartile range 0-26, p = .04). An increase in median medical intensive care unit (2.4, interquartile range 1.1-5.2 vs. 2.7, interquartile range 1.3-5.9), p = .009) but not hospital (8.3, interquartile range 4.1-17.0 vs. 8.2, interquartile range 4.0-16.8; p = .851) length of stay in days occurred with the intervention. The mean daily dosing of fentanyl and lorazepam decreased after the intervention.

conclusionsA multicomponent reorganization of medical intensive care unit services was associated with important reductions in mortality for medical intensive care unit patients, as well as an increased number of ventilator-free days. Substantial and sustained changes in clinically important outcomes may be obtained from organizational changes.

Indexed as

Process Assessment, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareAcademic Medical CentersCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsCritical CareFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioOrganizational InnovationPatient AdmissionPatient Care Team

Identifiers

PMID21076286
PMCPMC3383659
OpenAlexW1967644715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.