Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21076276›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2011

Progression and regression of premalignant cervical lesions in HIV-infected women from Soweto: a prospective cohort.

Tanvier Omar, Sheree Schwartz, Colleen Hanrahan, Tebogo Modisenyane, Nkeko Tshabangu, Jonathan E Golub, James A McIntyre, Glenda E Gray, Lerato Mohapi, Neil A Martinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanvier OmarDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sheree Schwartz
Colleen Hanrahan
Tebogo Modisenyane
Nkeko Tshabangu
Jonathan E Golub
James A McIntyre
Glenda E Gray
Lerato Mohapi
Neil A Martinson
Perinatal HIV Research Unit · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAJohns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

TUBERCULOSIS INTERNATIONAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMD43TW000010 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEYRER, CHRISTOPHER C. · 1988 to 2012
$19.8M
Longitudinal Study of HIV-Associated Lung Infections in SowetoR01HL090312 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAISSON, RICHARD E. · 2007 to 2012
$3.3M
South Africa Tuberculosis AIDS Training (SATBAT)U2RTW007370 · FIC · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI MARTINSON, NEIL A · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
South Africa Tuberculosis/AIDS TrainingU2RTW007373 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VAN DER HORST, CHARLES MICHAEL · 2007 to 2012
$1.4M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000010FIC NIH HHS D43TW000010-21S1FIC NIH HHS U2R TW007370FIC NIH HHS U2R TW007373NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090312NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL090312PHS HHS U2RTW007370/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo ascertain progression and regression of cervical dysplasia in HIV-infected women in Soweto.

designProspective cohort.

methodsWomen attending an HIV wellness clinic were offered cervical smears as part of care; smears were assessed using the Bethesda system. Those with high-grade lesions or worse were referred for colposcopy. Progression analyses included women with at least two smears at least 5.5 months apart. Hazard ratios were used to ascertain predictors of progression.

resultsTwo thousand, three hundred and twenty-five women had a baseline smear; their median age and CD4 cell count was 32 years and 312 cells/μl, respectively; 17% were taking highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); 62, 20 and 14% had normal, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), respectively. Of those with baseline normal or LSIL smears, 1074 had another smear; progression from normal to LSIL was 9.6/100 person-years (95% CI 8.3-11.1) and progression from normal or LSIL to HSIL was 4.6/100 person-years (95% CI 3.9-5.5). Of 225 women with LSIL at baseline and at least one subsequent smear at least 11.5 months later, 44.0% regressed to normal (21.2/100 person-years (95% CI 17.5-25.7)). Multivariate models suggested increasing risk for progression in women with CD4 cell count below 500 cells/μl and HAART may reduce the risk of progression [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.72 (0.52-0.99)].

conclusionHIV-infected women have high rates of prevalent and incident HSIL and LSIL with relatively low risk of regression to normal from LSIL. HAART appears to protect against progression. Our findings suggest cervical screening intervals should be less than 10 years - irrespective of age in women with CD4 cell counts below 500 cells/μl.

Indexed as

AdultAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansPrecancerous ConditionsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsRNA, ViralSouth AfricaUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID21076276
PMCPMC3166782
OpenAlexW2050280124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.