Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21076057›Full record

ReviewCarcinogenesis2011

Mutation and epigenetic molecular clocks in cancer.

Darryl Shibata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carcinogenesis, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mutation heterogeneity between primary gastric cancers and their matched lymph node metastases.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancer in light of experimental evolution.Current biology : CB · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Darryl ShibataDepartment of Pathology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. dshibata@usc.edu

Funding

Tumor Diversity As A Biomarker For Colorectal CancerR21CA149990 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SHIBATA, DARRYL K · 2010 to 2011
$383k
NCI NIH HHS CA149990NCI NIH HHS R21 CA149990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quandary of evolution is how to measure change over time. A natural inclination is to use morphologic criteria-the greater the differences between two phenotypes, the greater amount of time needed to evolve these differences. However, appearances may be deceiving, and another approach to infer time is with molecular clocks. Here, the greater the differences between two genomes, on average the greater the time since a common ancestor. Recent advances in DNA sequencing shed new light on how human cancers might evolve.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticMutationCircadian ClocksDisease ProgressionEvolution, MolecularGenomic InstabilityHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21076057
PMCPMC3026845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.