Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21075990›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2010

Office management of urinary incontinence among older patients.

Christopher Frank, Agata Szlanta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Parkinson disease primer, part 2: management of motor and nonmotor symptoms.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Challenges and achievements in caring for the elderly.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher FrankSt Mary's of Lake Hospital, 340 Union St, Kingston, ON K7L 5A2. frankc@pccchealth.org
Agata Szlanta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide family physicians with a guide to office management of urinary incontinence (UI) among older patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane database were searched using the terms urinary incontinence, stress incontinence, overactive bladder, urge incontinence, elderly, and geriatrics. MAIN MESSAGE: A variety of conditions affecting the nervous system and the lower urinary tract can affect bladder function and UI. Among older patients the effects of decreased cognition and impaired mobility can be substantial, and environmental barriers can play a role. When managing older patients with UI, emphasis on treating concurrent conditions, optimizing medications, and working on lifestyle and behavioural factors is at least as important as pharmacologic treatment. Medications are relevant, but the potential for adverse effects increases among older patients.

conclusionVarious resources are available to support family physicians in office management of UI, and family physicians can improve symptoms and the quality of patients' lives by screening for and helping patients to manage incontinence.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceComorbidityFamily PracticeFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansOffice ManagementPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID21075990
PMCPMC2980426
OpenAlexW2145696013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.