Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21075103›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2011

A model of giant vacuole dynamics in human Schlemm's canal endothelial cells.

Ryan M Pedrigi, David Simon, Ashley Reed, W Daniel Stamer, Darryl R Overby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Glaucoma discovery on a chip.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Neuroinflammation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryan M PedrigiDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
David Simon
Ashley Reed
W Daniel Stamer
Darryl R Overby
Imperial College London · GBTulane University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

The Mechanical Basis of Primary Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY019696 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI FREDBERG, JEFFREY J, JOHNSON, MARK · 2009 to 2019
$7.6M
CADHERIN DYNAMICS AND GLAUCOMAR01EY017007 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI STAMER, W DANIEL · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
How Does Aqueous Humor Cross the Inner Wall of Schlemm's Canal?R21EY018373 · NEI · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI OVERBY, DARRYL R · 2007 to 2008
$338k
NEI NIH HHS EY018373NEI NIH HHS EY019696NEI NIH HHS EY17007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019696NEI NIH HHS R21 EY018373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aqueous humour transport across the inner wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal likely involves flow through giant vacuoles and pores, but the mechanics of how these structures form and how they influence the regulation of intraocular pressure (IOP) are not well understood. In this study, we developed an in vitro model of giant vacuole formation in human Schlemm's canal endothelial cells (HSCECs) perfused in the basal-to-apical direction (i.e., the direction that flow crosses the inner wall in vivo) under controlled pressure drops (2 or 6 mmHg). The system was mounted on a confocal microscope for time-lapse en face imaging, and cells were stained with calcein, a fluorescent vital dye. At the onset of perfusion, elliptical void regions appeared within an otherwise uniformly stained cytoplasm, and 3-dimensional reconstructions revealed that these voids were dome-like outpouchings of the cell to form giant vacuole-like structures or GVLs that reproduced the classic "signet ring" appearance of true giant vacuoles. Increasing pressure drop from 2 to 6 mmHg increased GVL height (14 ± 4 vs. 21 ± 7 μm, p < 0.0001) and endothelial hydraulic conductivity (1.15 ± 0.04 vs. 2.11 ± 0.49 μl min⁻¹ mmHg⁻¹ cm⁻²; p < 0.001), but there was significant variability in the GVL response to pressure between cell lines isolated from different donors. During perfusion, GVLs were observed "migrating" and agglomerating about the cell layer and often collapsed despite maintaining the same pressure drop. GVL formation was also observed in human umbilical vein and porcine aortic endothelial cells, suggesting that giant vacuole formation is not a unique property of Schlemm's canal cells. However, in these other cell types, GVLs were rarely observed "migrating" or contracting during perfusion, suggesting that Schlemm's canal endothelial cells may be better adapted to withstand basal-to-apical directed pressure gradients. In conclusion, we have established an in vitro model system to study giant vacuole dynamics, and we have demonstrated that this system reproduces key aspects of giant vacuole morphology and behaviour. This model offers promising opportunities to investigate the role of endothelial cell biomechanics in the regulation of intraocular pressure in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCorneaEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalPerfusionScleraVacuoles

Identifiers

PMID21075103
PMCPMC3014386
OpenAlexW2057925970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.