Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21075046›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2011

Processing bodies and plant development.

Jun Xu, Nam-Hai Chua

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RNA regulation in plants.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Overexpression ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Core spliceosomal Sm proteins as constituents of cytoplasmic mRNPs in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun XuLaboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Nam-Hai Chua
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

LIGHT-RESPONSIVE GENESR01GM044640 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CHUA, NAM-HAI · 1991 to 2011
$5.3M
Light Responsive GenesR56GM044640 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CHUA, NAM-HAI · 2007 to 2007
$542k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM44640NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044640NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM044640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing bodies (P-bodies) contain RNA-protein complexes linked to cytoplasmic RNA decay pathways including mRNA decapping, nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) and small RNA-mediated decay. Plants deficient in P-body components display severe developmental perturbations, suggesting that these cytoplasmic bodies play important roles in regulating gene expression during plant development. Here, we summarize recent progress in the genetic dissection of P-body components and their roles in translational repression and mRNA decapping.

Indexed as

Plant DevelopmentRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalCytoplasmic StructuresPhenotypePlant ProteinsPlantsRNA, PlantPlant ProteinsRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID21075046
PMCPMC3042721
OpenAlexW2058207288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.