Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21074701›Full record

ReviewThe veterinary clinics of North America. Exotic animal practice2011

Analgesia in amphibians: preclinical studies and clinical applications.

Craig W Stevens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The veterinary clinics of North America. Exotic animal practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of Gross and Histopathologic Changes from Repeated Celiotomies in African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus laevis).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Thermal and Mechanical Noxious Stimuli for Testing Analgesics in White's Tree Frogs (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Uses and Doses of Local Anesthetics in Fish, Amphibians, and Reptiles.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Craig W StevensDepartment of Pharmacology & Physiology, Oklahoma State University-Center for Health Sciences, 1111 West 17th Street, Tulsa, OK 74107, USA. cw.stevens@okstate.edu

Funding

FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OPIOID RECEPTORSR15DA012448 · NIDA · OSU CENTER OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEVENS, CRAIG W · 1999 to 2007
$497k
NIDA NIH HHS DA012248NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA012448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical studies of analgesia in amphibians or recommendations for clinical use of analgesics in amphibian species are extremely limited. This article briefly reviews the issues surrounding the use of analgesics in amphibians, starting with common definitions of pain and analgesia when applied to nonhuman animals. Nociceptive and endogenous opioid systems in amphibians are reviewed, and results of preclinical research on opioid and nonopioid analgesics summarized. Recommended opioid and nonopioid analgesics are summarized, and practical recommendations made for their clinical use.

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnalgesiaAnalgesicsAnimalsOpioid PeptidesPainAnalgesicsOpioid Peptides

Identifiers

PMID21074701
PMCPMC3056481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.