Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21074624›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2011

Algorithm for selection of optimized EPR distance restraints for de novo protein structure determination.

Kelli Kazmier, Nathan S Alexander, Jens Meiler, Hassane S McHaourab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protein Modeling with DEER Spectroscopy.Annual review of biophysics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The contribution of modern EPR to structural biology.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelli KazmierChemical and Physical Biology Program, 340 Light Hall, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. kelli.kazmier@vanderbilt.edu
Nathan S Alexander
Jens Meiler
Hassane S McHaourab

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAM AT VANDERBILTT32GM008320 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CHAZIN, WALTER J. · 1989 to 2023
$7.9M
Structural Dynamics of Multi-drug TransportersR01GM077659 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MCHAOURAB, HASSANE S · 2006 to 2023
$5.0M
Membrane Protein Structure Elucidation from sparse NMR data (KAMP)R01GM080403 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2007 to 2019
$3.0M
LeuT Membrane Transporter Dynamics Determined by EPR and Computational TechniquesF31MH086222 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER, NATHAN · 2009 to 2011
$89k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077659NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080403NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM080403NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM77659NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008320NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH086222NIMH NIH HHS F31MH086222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hybrid protein structure determination approach combining sparse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) distance restraints and Rosetta de novo protein folding has been previously demonstrated to yield high quality models (Alexander et al. (2008)). However, widespread application of this methodology to proteins of unknown structures is hindered by the lack of a general strategy to place spin label pairs in the primary sequence. In this work, we report the development of an algorithm that optimally selects spin labeling positions for the purpose of distance measurements by EPR. For the α-helical subdomain of T4 lysozyme (T4L), simulated restraints that maximize sequence separation between the two spin labels while simultaneously ensuring pairwise connectivity of secondary structure elements yielded vastly improved models by Rosetta folding. 54% of all these models have the correct fold compared to only 21% and 8% correctly folded models when randomly placed restraints or no restraints are used, respectively. Moreover, the improvements in model quality require a limited number of optimized restraints, which is determined by the pairwise connectivities of T4L α-helices. The predicted improvement in Rosetta model quality was verified by experimental determination of distances between spin labels pairs selected by the algorithm. Overall, our results reinforce the rationale for the combined use of sparse EPR distance restraints and de novo folding. By alleviating the experimental bottleneck associated with restraint selection, this algorithm sets the stage for extending computational structure determination to larger, traditionally elusive protein topologies of critical structural and biochemical importance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProtein Structure, SecondaryElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularProtein FoldingProteinsSpin LabelsProteinsSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID21074624
PMCPMC3073550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.