ArticleJournal of structural biology2011
Algorithm for selection of optimized EPR distance restraints for de novo protein structure determination.
Article in Journal of structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling protein conformational ensembles by guiding AlphaFold2 with Double Electron Electron Resonance (DEER) distance distributions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Protein Modeling with DEER Spectroscopy.Annual review of biophysics · 2025Review
- Inference of Joint Conformational Distributions from Separately Acquired Experimental Measurements.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2021Article
- Rapid Simulation of Unprocessed DEER Decay Data for Protein Fold Prediction.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Structural Characterization of Biomolecules through Atomistic Simulations Guided by DEER Measurements.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2019Article
- Confidence Analysis of DEER Data and Its Structural Interpretation with Ensemble-Biased Metadynamics.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- The contribution of modern EPR to structural biology.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2018Article
- Pushing the size limit of de novo structure ensemble prediction guided by sparse SDSL-EPR restraints to 200 residues: The monomeric and homodimeric forms of BAX.Journal of structural biology · 2016Article
- Structure of an E. coli integral membrane sulfurtransferase and its structural transition upon SCN(-) binding defined by EPR-based hybrid method.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
- Assembly states of FliM and FliG within the flagellar switch complex.Journal of molecular biology · 2015Article
- Computational modeling of membrane proteins.Proteins · 2015Review
- Navigating Membrane Protein Structure, Dynamics, and Energy Landscapes Using Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopy.Methods in enzymology · 2015Article
- A Straightforward Approach to the Analysis of Double Electron-Electron Resonance Data.Methods in enzymology · 2015Article
- Tau binds to lipid membrane surfaces via short amphipathic helices located in its microtubule-binding repeats.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Article
- Structural refinement from restrained-ensemble simulations based on EPR/DEER data: application to T4 lysozyme.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
- Restrained-ensemble molecular dynamics simulations based on distance histograms from double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
- Conformational ensemble of the sodium-coupled aspartate transporter.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A hybrid protein structure determination approach combining sparse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) distance restraints and Rosetta de novo protein folding has been previously demonstrated to yield high quality models (Alexander et al. (2008)). However, widespread application of this methodology to proteins of unknown structures is hindered by the lack of a general strategy to place spin label pairs in the primary sequence. In this work, we report the development of an algorithm that optimally selects spin labeling positions for the purpose of distance measurements by EPR. For the α-helical subdomain of T4 lysozyme (T4L), simulated restraints that maximize sequence separation between the two spin labels while simultaneously ensuring pairwise connectivity of secondary structure elements yielded vastly improved models by Rosetta folding. 54% of all these models have the correct fold compared to only 21% and 8% correctly folded models when randomly placed restraints or no restraints are used, respectively. Moreover, the improvements in model quality require a limited number of optimized restraints, which is determined by the pairwise connectivities of T4L α-helices. The predicted improvement in Rosetta model quality was verified by experimental determination of distances between spin labels pairs selected by the algorithm. Overall, our results reinforce the rationale for the combined use of sparse EPR distance restraints and de novo folding. By alleviating the experimental bottleneck associated with restraint selection, this algorithm sets the stage for extending computational structure determination to larger, traditionally elusive protein topologies of critical structural and biochemical importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.