Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21074233›Full record

ReviewTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2011

Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis.

Pankaj Srivastava, Anand Dayama, Sanjana Mehrotra, Shyam Sundar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pankaj SrivastavaDepartment of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Anand Dayama
Sanjana Mehrotra
Shyam Sundar

Funding

Visceral Leishmaniasis in Bihar State, IndiaP50AI074321 · NIAID · BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY · PI SINGH, NARENDRA NATH · 2007 to 2016
$6.4M
Visceral Leishmaniasis in Bihar State, IndiaU19AI074321 · NIAID · BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY · PI SUNDAR, SHYAM · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS 1P50AI074321-01NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI074321NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI074321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease with up to 350 million people at risk of infection worldwide. Among its different clinical manifestations, visceral is the most severe form. Since clinical features of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) mimic several other common diseases, accurate diagnosis is crucial as the treatment is associated with significant toxicity. Invasive and risky techniques involving demonstration of the parasites in stained preparations from splenic and bone marrow aspirate is still the gold standard for VL diagnosis. Serological tests using rK39 in ELISA or rapid immunochromatographic format, Direct Agglutination Test (DAT), immunoblotting have issues related to a significant proportion of asymptomatic individuals being positive with these tests and their inability to diagnose relapses as these remain positive for several months to years after cure. PCR is the most common molecular technique successfully used for diagnosis and differentiation of species. Through this review we focus extensively on the comparative utilities of the various diagnostic tools currently available for VL, describing in depth their advantages and disadvantages, addressing the recent advances attained in the field. A simple, rapid, non invasive, accurate and cost effective marker of active VL, which can be used in field conditions, is necessary to improve diagnosis of VL.

Indexed as

Agglutination TestsAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLeishmaniasis, VisceralPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID21074233
PMCPMC2999003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.