Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21074075›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2010

[Importance of patient involvement in disease self-management: the expert patient. Role of new technologies to support patient autonomy].

José Manuel Millaruelo Trillo

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

José Manuel Millaruelo TrilloCentro de Salud Torrero Este, Zaragoza, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of population aging in our geographical and social setting and progress in preventing premature death, there is an ever-increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, in this case diabetes. In our environment, the dietary changes and sedentariness that have led to the spectacular rise in obesity have increased the prevalence of diabetes. Our health system is reasonably well prepared to manage acute disease but neither health professionals nor referral circuits -nor probably patients- are prepared for the new scenario. Consequently, we should prepare ourselves for the management of chronic disease, encourage patient participation in decision-making and promote a new, less paternalistic, paradigm of the doctor-patient relationship. The experiences initiated by the University of Stanford, or in Spain by the National Patients' Forum, could serve as models. In the next few years, the figure of the expert patient will undoubtedly be highly useful. In general, physicians and patients place a great deal of faith in the contribution of new treatments and technologies to the relief or management of disease. To deny this in the XXI century would be ridiculous, but all the possibilities of these treatments and technologies only show positive results in suitably educated patients. This is a task that should never be forgotten.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPersonal AutonomySelf CareDiabetes MellitusHealth LiteracyHumans

Identifiers

PMID21074075
PMCPMC8171394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.