Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21073878›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2011

Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping.

Michael D Tyka, Daniel A Keedy, Ingemar André, Frank Dimaio, Yifan Song, David C Richardson, Jane S Richardson, David Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 273 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Generative Neuro-Symbolic AI for Protein Sequence Design.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beyond native sequence recovery: Improved modeling of the sequence-energy landscape of protein structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Cryo-EM provides insight into how thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Conformational equilibria in the activation of cystine-knot hormone receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael D TykaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Daniel A Keedy
Ingemar André
Frank Dimaio
Yifan Song
David C Richardson
Jane S Richardson
David Baker

Funding

New Kind of Quality Management for X-ray &NMR ModelsR01GM073930 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARDSON, DAVID CLAUDE · 2005 to 2013
$2.3M
High resolution structure modeling with RosettaR01GM092802 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, DAVID · 2010 to 2017
$2.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM073930NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073930NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092802Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What conformations do protein molecules populate in solution? Crystallography provides a high-resolution description of protein structure in the crystal environment, while NMR describes structure in solution but using less data. NMR structures display more variability, but is this because crystal contacts are absent or because of fewer data constraints? Here we report unexpected insight into this issue obtained through analysis of detailed protein energy landscapes generated by large-scale, native-enhanced sampling of conformational space with Rosetta@home for 111 protein domains. In the absence of tightly associating binding partners or ligands, the lowest-energy Rosetta models were nearly all <2.5 Å C(α)RMSD from the experimental structure; this result demonstrates that structure prediction accuracy for globular proteins is limited mainly by the ability to sample close to the native structure. While the lowest-energy models are similar to deposited structures, they are not identical; the largest deviations are most often in regions involved in ligand, quaternary, or crystal contacts. For ligand binding proteins, the low energy models may resemble the apo structures, and for oligomeric proteins, the monomeric assembly intermediates. The deviations between the low energy models and crystal structures largely disappear when landscapes are computed in the context of the crystal lattice or multimer. The computed low-energy ensembles, with tight crystal-structure-like packing in the core, but more NMR-structure-like variability in loops, may in some cases resemble the native state ensembles of proteins better than individual crystal or NMR structures, and can suggest experimentally testable hypotheses relating alternative states and structural heterogeneity to function.

Indexed as

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularComputer SimulationCrystallizationCrystallography, X-RayHydrogen BondingProtein ConformationProteinsThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21073878
PMCPMC3046547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.