Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21073700›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Comparative transcriptomics of drought responses in Populus: a meta-analysis of genome-wide expression profiling in mature leaves and root apices across two genotypes.

David Cohen, Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot, Emilie Tisserant, Sandrine Balzergue, Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette, Gaëlle Lelandais, Nathalie Ningre, Jean-Pierre Renou, Jean-Philippe Tamby, Didier Le Thiec and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 199 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Abscisic Acid-Mediated Drought Tolerance inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The GlutathioneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Drought-Induced Root Pressure inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. MicroRNAs in Woody Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

David CohenINRA, Nancy Université, UMR1137 Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières, IFR 110 EFABA, F-54280 Champenoux, France.
Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot
Emilie Tisserant
Sandrine Balzergue
Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette
Gaëlle Lelandais
Nathalie Ningre
Jean-Pierre Renou
Jean-Philippe Tamby
Didier Le Thiec
Irène Hummel
Université de Lorraine · FRUniversité d'Évry Val-d'Essonne · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREcologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières · FRInserm · FRInteractions Arbres-Microorganismes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparative genomics has emerged as a promising means of unravelling the molecular networks underlying complex traits such as drought tolerance. Here we assess the genotype-dependent component of the drought-induced transcriptome response in two poplar genotypes differing in drought tolerance. Drought-induced responses were analysed in leaves and root apices and were compared with available transcriptome data from other Populus species.

resultsUsing a multi-species designed microarray, a genomic DNA-based selection of probesets provided an unambiguous between-genotype comparison. Analyses of functional group enrichment enabled the extraction of processes physiologically relevant to drought response. The drought-driven changes in gene expression occurring in root apices were consistent across treatments and genotypes. For mature leaves, the transcriptome response varied weakly but in accordance with the duration of water deficit. A differential clustering algorithm revealed similar and divergent gene co-expression patterns among the two genotypes. Since moderate stress levels induced similar physiological responses in both genotypes, the genotype-dependent transcriptional responses could be considered as intrinsic divergences in genome functioning. Our meta-analysis detected several candidate genes and processes that are differentially regulated in root and leaf, potentially under developmental control, and preferentially involved in early and long-term responses to drought.

conclusionsIn poplar, the well-known drought-induced activation of sensing and signalling cascades was specific to the early response in leaves but was found to be general in root apices. Comparing our results to what is known in arabidopsis, we found that transcriptional remodelling included signalling and a response to energy deficit in roots in parallel with transcriptional indices of hampered assimilation in leaves, particularly in the drought-sensitive poplar genotype.

Indexed as

DroughtsGene Expression ProfilingMeta-Analysis as TopicCluster AnalysisEcosystemGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, PlantGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantGenotypeMeristemMolecular Sequence AnnotationOrgan SpecificityPlant LeavesPopulusGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID21073700
PMCPMC3091765
OpenAlexW2056464728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.