Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21072233›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2010

Serological evaluation of Mycobacterium ulcerans antigens identified by comparative genomics.

Sacha J Pidot, Jessica L Porter, Laurent Marsollier, Annick Chauty, Florence Migot-Nabias, Cyril Badaut, Angèle Bénard, Marie-Therese Ruf, Torsten Seemann, Paul D R Johnson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Buruli ulcer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  3. Spatiotemporal distribution ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Vivo Imaging of BioluminescentThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Sacha J PidotDepartment of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica L Porter
Laurent Marsollier
Annick Chauty
Florence Migot-Nabias
Cyril Badaut
Angèle Bénard
Marie-Therese Ruf
Torsten Seemann
Paul D R Johnson
John K Davies
Grant A Jenkin
Gerd Pluschke
Timothy P Stinear
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Melbourne · AUMonash University · AUAustin Health · AUDélégation Paris 5 · FRMelbourne Bioinformatics · AUMère et Enfant en Milieu Tropical · FRUniversité d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A specific and sensitive serodiagnostic test for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection would greatly assist the diagnosis of Buruli ulcer and would also facilitate seroepidemiological surveys. By comparative genomics, we identified 45 potential M. ulcerans specific proteins, of which we were able to express and purify 33 in E. coli. Sera from 30 confirmed Buruli ulcer patients, 24 healthy controls from the same endemic region and 30 healthy controls from a non-endemic region in Benin were screened for antibody responses to these specific proteins by ELISA. Serum IgG responses of Buruli ulcer patients were highly variable, however, seven proteins (MUP045, MUP057, MUL_0513, Hsp65, and the polyketide synthase domains ER, AT propionate, and KR A) showed a significant difference between patient and non-endemic control antibody responses. However, when sera from the healthy control subjects living in the same Buruli ulcer endemic area as the patients were examined, none of the proteins were able to discriminate between these two groups. Nevertheless, six of the seven proteins showed an ability to distinguish people living in an endemic area from those in a non-endemic area with an average sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 88%, suggesting exposure to M. ulcerans. Further validation of these six proteins is now underway to assess their suitability for use in Buruli ulcer seroepidemiological studies. Such studies are urgently needed to assist efforts to uncover environmental reservoirs and understand transmission pathways of the M. ulcerans.

Indexed as

GenomicsAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBuruli UlcerCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium ulceransAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21072233
PMCPMC2970529
OpenAlexW2043051429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.