Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21070951›Full record

ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2010

Detailed analysis of function divergence in a large and diverse domain superfamily: toward a refined protocol of function classification.

Benoit H Dessailly, Oliver C Redfern, Alison L Cuff, Christine A Orengo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Creative destruction: New protein folds from old.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Structural dynamics in the evolution of a bilobed protein scaffold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diversity in protein domain superfamilies.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A large conformational change in the putative ATP pyrophosphatase PF0828 induced by ATP binding.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2011
    Article
  17. Metagenomics and the protein universe.Current opinion in structural biology · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benoit H DessaillyDepartment of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College of London, Gower Street, London WC1E6BT, UK. benoit@biochem.ucl.ac.uk
Oliver C Redfern
Alison L Cuff
Christine A Orengo

Funding

The Midwest Center for Structural GenomicsU54GM074942 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOACHIMIAK, ANDRZEJ · 2005 to 2009
$51.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some superfamilies contain large numbers of protein domains with very different functions. The ability to refine the functional classification of domains within these superfamilies is necessary for better understanding the evolution of functions and to guide function prediction of new relatives. To achieve this, a suitable starting point is the detailed analysis of functional divisions and mechanisms of functional divergence in a single superfamily. Here, we present such a detailed analysis in the superfamily of HUP domains. A biologically meaningful functional classification of HUP domains is obtained manually. Mechanisms of function diversification are investigated in detail using this classification. We observe that structural motifs play an important role in shaping broad functional divergence, whereas residue-level changes shape diversity at a more specific level. In parallel we examine the ability of an automated protocol to capture the biologically meaningful classification, with a view to automatically extending this classification in the future.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationCluster AnalysisDatabases, ProteinProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein SubunitsProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID21070951
PMCPMC3023962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.