ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2010
An ATPase R-finger leaves its print on transcriptional activation.
Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized activators of σ54-dependent transcription.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial enhancer-binding proteins (bEBPs) are AAA+ ATPases that remodel σ⁵⁴-RNA polymerase holoenzyme for transcription. Chen et al., in this issue of Structure, show the R-finger, a conserved AAA+ arginine residue, drives structural changes that allow the ATP-bound bEBP to engage σ⁵⁴ en route to remodeling.
Identifiers
21070936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.