Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21070585›Full record

ArticleBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2011

Hippocampal memory consolidation during sleep: a comparison of mammals and birds.

Niels C Rattenborg, Dolores Martinez-Gonzalez, Timothy C Roth, Vladimir V Pravosudov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Zebrafish sleep displays distinct sub-states.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is episodic-like memoryPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Why birds are smart.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Memories replayed: reactivating past successes and new dilemmas.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. What Is REM Sleep?Current biology : CB · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Local Aspects of Avian Non-REM and REM Sleep.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Niels C RattenborgMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Sleep and Flight Group, Eberhard-Gwinner-Strasse, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany. rattenborg@orn.mpg.de
Dolores Martinez-Gonzalez
Timothy C Roth
Vladimir V Pravosudov
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology · DEUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Effect of social environment on memory, hippocampal structure and neurogenesisR01MH076797 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI PRAVOSUDOV, VLADIMIR V · 2007 to 2009
$568k
Hippocampal neurogenesis and memoryR21MH079892 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI PRAVOSUDOV, VLADIMIR V · 2007 to 2008
$350k
NIMH NIH HHS MH076797NIMH NIH HHS MH079892NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076797NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH079892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition from wakefulness to sleep is marked by pronounced changes in brain activity. The brain rhythms that characterize the two main types of mammalian sleep, slow-wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, are thought to be involved in the functions of sleep. In particular, recent theories suggest that the synchronous slow-oscillation of neocortical neuronal membrane potentials, the defining feature of SWS, is involved in processing information acquired during wakefulness. According to the Standard Model of memory consolidation, during wakefulness the hippocampus receives input from neocortical regions involved in the initial encoding of an experience and binds this information into a coherent memory trace that is then transferred to the neocortex during SWS where it is stored and integrated within preexisting memory traces. Evidence suggests that this process selectively involves direct connections from the hippocampus to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), a multimodal, high-order association region implicated in coordinating the storage and recall of remote memories in the neocortex. The slow-oscillation is thought to orchestrate the transfer of information from the hippocampus by temporally coupling hippocampal sharp-wave/ripples (SWRs) and thalamocortical spindles. SWRs are synchronous bursts of hippocampal activity, during which waking neuronal firing patterns are reactivated in the hippocampus and neocortex in a coordinated manner. Thalamocortical spindles are brief 7-14 Hz oscillations that may facilitate the encoding of information reactivated during SWRs. By temporally coupling the readout of information from the hippocampus with conditions conducive to encoding in the neocortex, the slow-oscillation is thought to mediate the transfer of information from the hippocampus to the neocortex. Although several lines of evidence are consistent with this function for mammalian SWS, it is unclear whether SWS serves a similar function in birds, the only taxonomic group other than mammals to exhibit SWS and REM sleep. Based on our review of research on avian sleep, neuroanatomy, and memory, although involved in some forms of memory consolidation, avian sleep does not appear to be involved in transferring hippocampal memories to other brain regions. Despite exhibiting the slow-oscillation, SWRs and spindles have not been found in birds. Moreover, although birds independently evolved a brain region--the caudolateral nidopallium (NCL)--involved in performing high-order cognitive functions similar to those performed by the PFC, direct connections between the NCL and hippocampus have not been found in birds, and evidence for the transfer of information from the hippocampus to the NCL or other extra-hippocampal regions is lacking. Although based on the absence of evidence for various traits, collectively, these findings suggest that unlike mammalian SWS, avian SWS may not be involved in transferring memories from the hippocampus. Furthermore, it suggests that the slow-oscillation, the defining feature of mammalian and avian SWS, may serve a more general function independent of that related to coordinating the transfer of information from the hippocampus to the PFC in mammals. Given that SWS is homeostatically regulated (a process intimately related to the slow-oscillation) in mammals and birds, functional hypotheses linked to this process may apply to both taxonomic groups.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsHippocampusMammalsMemorySleep

Identifiers

PMID21070585
PMCPMC3117012
OpenAlexW2126265616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.