Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21070206›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2010

Forward genetic dissection of innate response to infection in inbred mouse strains: selected success stories.

S Gruenheid, P Gros

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Facing the challenges of multidrug-resistantHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The impact of host genetic background in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infections.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S GruenheidComplex Traits Program, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. samantha.gruenheid@mcgill.ca
P Gros
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse genetics is a powerful tool for the dissection of genes, proteins, and pathways important in biological processes. Application of this approach to study the host response to infection has been a rich source of discoveries that have increased our understanding of the early innate pathways involved in responding to microbial infections. Here we review some of the key discoveries that have arisen from pinpointing the genetic defect in mouse strains with unusual or extreme response to infection and have led to insights into pathogen sensing pathways and downstream effector functions of the early innate immune response.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsBacterial InfectionsCytokinesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMiceMice, Inbred StrainsPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, Pattern RecognitionVirus DiseasesCytokinesReceptors, Pattern Recognition

Identifiers

PMID21070206
PMCPMC3026542
OpenAlexW1501882952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.