Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21069949›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2010

Predicting residential air exchange rates from questionnaires and meteorology: model evaluation in central North Carolina.

Michael S Breen, Miyuki Breen, Ronald W Williams, Bradley D Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Short-term ambient PMEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Article
  4. TracMyAir smartphone application for modeling exposures to PMThe Science of the total environment · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of TracMyAir Smartphone Application for Modeling Exposures to Ambient PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modeling individual exposures to ambient PMThe Science of the total environment · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of climate change on residential infiltration and air pollution exposure.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A review of air exchange rate models for air pollution exposure assessments.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Toward refined estimates of ambient PMAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994) · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael S BreenNational Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States. breen.michael@epa.gov
Miyuki Breen
Ronald W Williams
Bradley D Schultz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical aspect of air pollution exposure models is the estimation of the air exchange rate (AER) of individual homes, where people spend most of their time. The AER, which is the airflow into and out of a building, is a primary mechanism for entry of outdoor air pollutants and removal of indoor source emissions. The mechanistic Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL) AER model was linked to a leakage area model to predict AER from questionnaires and meteorology. The LBL model was also extended to include natural ventilation (LBLX). Using literature-reported parameter values, AER predictions from LBL and LBLX models were compared to data from 642 daily AER measurements across 31 detached homes in central North Carolina, with corresponding questionnaires and meteorological observations. Data was collected on seven consecutive days during each of four consecutive seasons. For the individual model-predicted and measured AER, the median absolute difference was 43% (0.17 h(-1)) and 40% (0.17 h(-1)) for the LBL and LBLX models, respectively. Additionally, a literature-reported empirical scale factor (SF) AER model was evaluated, which showed a median absolute difference of 50% (0.25 h(-1)). The capability of the LBL, LBLX, and SF models could help reduce the AER uncertainty in air pollution exposure models used to develop exposure metrics for health studies.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAir MovementsAir PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorAtmosphereEnvironmental MonitoringForecastingMeteorological ConceptsNorth CarolinaParticle SizeSeasonsSurveys and QuestionnairesAir Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID21069949
PMCPMC3001757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.