ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2010
[Bridging, interruption and switching of anticoagulants in trauma surgery].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Anticoagulation medication for proximal femoral fractures: prospective validation study of new institutional guidelines].Der Unfallchirurg · 2013Trial
- [Elderly trauma patients with proximal femur fractures : Statistical evaluation of regular process data from a trauma center for the elderly].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
- [Perioperative management of anticoagulation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014Review
- [New oral anticoagulants from the perspective of trauma surgery].Der Unfallchirurg · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients under long-term administration of vitamin K antagonists may require temporary interruption of anticoagulation therapy for invasive procedures or trauma surgery. Due to the long half-life of these substances bridging therapy with anticoagulants having a shorter half-life may become necessary. In this situation the risk of bleeding due to the intervention and the risk of thromboembolism due the underlying disease must be assessed. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are considered to be the medication of choice for bridging anticoagulation, mainly due to practical reasons and as they do not require coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment out of hospital treatment is feasible. Low molecular weight heparins are not authorized for the indication of bridging anticoagulation, however, on the basis of recent studies on large patient cohorts, the evidence of efficacy and safety is significantly better for LMWHs than for unfractionated heparin. New oral anticoagulants will soon become available for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Due to the shorter half-lives these compounds will no longer require bridging anticoagulation. However, the trauma surgeon should be familiar with the dosing regimens for different indications in order to adequately decide about the preoperative cessation and the perioperative pause of these anticoagulants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.